Federal contractor · JOHNSTOWN, PA

CTC ENTERPRISE VENTURES CORP

CTC ENTERPRISE VENTURES CORP received $6.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 54 awards (+195% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $56.5M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($3.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.8M
New awards
54
Sole-source
93%
Single offer
6.1%
UEI
HK2PDGA6HQ54
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP company family: 2 registered entities, $44M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPJOHNSTOWN, PA · Family page
    $37.2M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.8MFY2017
  2. 835.3KFY2018
  3. 1.9MFY2019
  4. 926.7KFY2020
  5. 3.8MFY2021
  6. 23.2MFY2022
  7. 4.1MFY2023
  8. 10.9MFY2024
  9. 2.3MFY2025
  10. 6.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 35 awards
  2. 7 awards
  3. 12 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$4M58%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$2.5M36%
  3. IT & telecom$396.5K5.8%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition99%
    US 39% · $6.8M
  • Sole-source awards93%
    US 30% · $6.4M
  • Single-offer competitions6.1%
    US 8.7% · $419.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 3 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 7 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Cambria County, PA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 7, 2022 – Jun 8, 2026· N0038322FZB0A
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Cambria County, PA· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 19, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· SPRPA126CRA13
  3. Department of the Navy· Cambria County, PA· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2022 – Jan 13, 2026· N0038322FZB0L
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Cambria County, PA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Nov 19, 2025 – Nov 19, 2025· SPRPA126CRA12
  5. Department of the Navy· Cambria County, PA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Apr 3, 2026 – Apr 3, 2026· N0038326FZB00
  6. Department of the Army· Cambria County, PA· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 30, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· W912CH26F0192
  7. Department of the Navy· Cambria County, PA· IT & telecom· Mar 13, 2026 – Apr 29, 2026· N0038326FZB01
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Cambria County, PA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 27, 2025 – Apr 2, 2026· SPE4A725P7470

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $480K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.6M received
  • FY2022: $48.2K paid out · $353K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $564.6K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $356.9K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $184.3K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $480K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

63 companies · $350.3M reported

  1. BIRMINGHAM, AL · 12 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PASCAGOULA, MS · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 7 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

18 companies · $56.8M reported

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 6 subawards
  2. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 13 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BETHESDA, MD · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 27 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INNOVASYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL LLC$85.3M−99% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BELTSVILLE, MD · 32% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesFederal Acquisition Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SCHMIDT-PRIME GROUP, LLC$54.6M−47% in FY2026
    PENSACOLA, FL · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Concurrent Technologies CorporationAI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$160K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$550K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$150K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$160K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$160K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$80K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  2. Defense14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES28 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE28 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Brody Group L.L.C. Public Affairs$350K
    14 reports
  2. PRASAM$200K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.