Federal contractor · PRESCOTT, AZ

CONSERVATION BY DESIGN, INC.

CONSERVATION BY DESIGN, INC. received $311.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+3,746% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.1M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($311.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$311.5K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
ZYLJJU4YH576
Other than small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 71.2KFY2017
  2. 58.2KFY2018
  3. 119.7KFY2019
  4. 65.8KFY2020
  5. 0FY2021
  6. 250.9KFY2022
  7. 133.2KFY2023
  8. 122.3KFY2024
  9. 8.1KFY2025
  10. 311.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$311.5K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$262.3K84%
  2. Professional services$49.2K16%

Where the work was performed

  1. Missoula County, MT$262.3K84%
  2. Grant County, NM$49.2K16%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $311.5K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $311.5K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. LOLO PASS VISITOR CENTER INTERPRETIVE DESIGN$262.3K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Other equipment & supplies· Aug 27, 2026 – Aug 27, 2026· 1240BD26F0019
  2. COPPER RIVER DELTA, PRINCE WILLIAM SOUND INTERPRETIVE DESIGN$99.7K
    Forest Service· Chugach Census Area, AK· Professional services· Sep 27, 2024 – Jul 14, 2026· 12441924F0037
  3. GILA NATIONAL FOREST INTERPRETIVE PLAN FOR DEVELOPED RECREATION SITES$49.2K
    Forest Service· Grant County, NM· Professional services· Mar 11, 2026 – May 21, 2026· 127EAV26F0010

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SEA REACH, LTD$4.8M−42% in FY2026
    SHERIDAN, OR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Museums, historical sites, and similar institutions
  2. LG2 ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.$2.8M−87% in FY2026
    JACKSONVILLE, FL · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Museums, historical sites, and similar institutions

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.