Federal contractor · SEATTLE, WA

CONVERGENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES US INC

CONVERGENT MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES US INC received $285.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−83% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.5M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($285.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$285.2K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NLRTH2TJW1B6
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 162.1KFY2017
  2. 754.8KFY2018
  3. 448.2KFY2019
  4. 124.6KFY2020
  5. 203.9KFY2021
  6. 3.8MFY2022
  7. 85KFY2023
  8. 0FY2024
  9. 1.6MFY2025
  10. 285.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration$285.2K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$285.2K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. King County, WA$285.2K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. E014042 STTR PHASE II PROCESS SIMULATION & OPTIMIZATION FOR THIN-PLY COMPOSITES$1M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· King County, WA· Research & development· Mar 25, 2022 – Aug 28, 2026· 80NSSC22CA031
  2. STTR PHASE III - PROCESS SIMULATION & OPTIMIZATION FOR THIN-PLY COMPOSITES$267.5K
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· King County, WA· Research & development· Sep 30, 2025 – Sep 28, 2026· 80NSSC25C0506

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ACTIVE VIGILANCE INC$1.8M
    CHEYENNE, WY · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. INGENIUM TECHNOLOGIES CORP$1.6M−84% in FY2026
    ROCKFORD, IL · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. MAGNOLIA OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$2.4M−100% in FY2026
    WOBURN, MA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 11, 2026, loaded Oct 11, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 11, 2026, loaded Oct 11, 2026.