Federal contractor · MOAB, UT

COUNTY OF GRAND

COUNTY OF GRAND received $106.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−34% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $921.1K. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($106.8K). It also received $6.8M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$106.8K
New awards
4
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
KVPMAQ6HAFW9
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 14.9KFY2017
  2. 23KFY2018
  3. 27.9KFY2019
  4. 28KFY2020
  5. 167.6KFY2021
  6. 153.4KFY2022
  7. 124.3KFY2023
  8. 114.1KFY2024
  9. 161KFY2025
  10. 106.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$114.3K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Grand County, UT$106.8K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $106.8K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $106.8K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Grand County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Apr 12, 2021 – Jun 10, 2026· 140L3521C0001
  2. Bureau of Land Management· Grand County, UT· Professional services· Apr 30, 2026 – Jun 3, 2026· 140L5726C0004
  3. Bureau of Land Management· Grand County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jun 13, 2022 – May 19, 2026· 140L3522P0012
  4. Bureau of Land Management· Grand County, UT· Professional services· Sep 7, 2023 – Dec 29, 2025· 140L5723P0027

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

COUNTY OF GRAND received $6.8M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 9 actions (4 new awards), −67% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 20.901 · Payments for Essential Air Services ($4.6M).

Assistance · FY2026
$6.8M
New awards
4
Actions
9
Since FY2021
$49.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 2.5MFY2021
  2. 9MFY2022
  3. 1.5MFY2023
  4. 8.5MFY2024
  5. 20.9MFY2025
  6. 6.8MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$4.6M68%
  2. Grants$2.2M32%
  3. Other assistance$5,0000.1%

Top programs

  1. 20.901 · Payments for Essential Air Services$4.6M68%
  2. 20.116 · Airport Improvement Program$1.4M21%
  3. 20.117 · Airport Infrastructure Grants$794.2K12%
  4. 10.704 · Law Enforcement Agreements$5,0000.1%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Transportation
  2. Department of Transportation
  3. Forest Service$5,0000.1%
    Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 20.901 · Payments for Essential Air Services· Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation· Direct payment for specified use· Nov 26, 2025 – Mar 11, 2026· 69A3452660556
  2. 20.116 · Airport Improvement Program· Federal Aviation Administration· Formula grant· Apr 14, 2026 – Aug 20, 2026· 34900200502026
  3. 20.117 · Airport Infrastructure Grants· Federal Aviation Administration· Project grant· Sep 17, 2026 – Sep 17, 2026· 34900200512026
  4. 10.699 · Partnership Agreements· Forest Service· Other financial assistance· Jul 20, 2023 – Feb 2, 2026· 23CS11041000011
  5. 81.104 · Environmental Remediation and Waste Processing and Disposal· Department of Energy· Project grant· Jul 20, 2021 – Nov 17, 2025· DEEM0005196
  6. 10.704 · Law Enforcement Agreements· Forest Service· Other financial assistance· Feb 12, 2026 – Feb 12, 2026· 26LE11041000003

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $423.6K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. GOVERNORS OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$423.6K100%
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $31.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $50K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $48K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $337.1K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $423.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $890.3K reported

  1. GOVERNORS OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$760.6K
    SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 2 subawards
  2. OAKLAND, CA · 1 subaward
  3. SALT LAKE CITY, UT · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COUNTY OF CLACKAMAS$287.9K+148% in FY2026
    OREGON CITY, OR · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Investigation and security services
  2. COOS COUNTY OREGON$389.7K−128% in FY2026
    COQUILLE, OR · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Investigation and security services
  3. COUNTY OF GARFIELD$266.9K+27% in FY2026
    PANGUITCH, UT · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.