Federal contractor · VIENNA, VA

CREDENCE DYNAMO SOLUTIONS LLC

CREDENCE DYNAMO SOLUTIONS LLC received $118.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 20 awards (−26% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $451.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($79.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$118.5M
New awards
20
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
29%
UEI
VH4RGBBMUMP1
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3MFY2020
  2. 9.6MFY2021
  3. 22MFY2022
  4. 49.8MFY2023
  5. 89MFY2024
  6. 159.7MFY2025
  7. 118.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$79.5M67%
    8 awards
  2. Defense Information Systems Agency$18M15%
    1 awards
  3. U.S. Coast Guard$11.7M9.8%
    5 awards
  4. Department of the Army$6.8M5.7%
    2 awards
  5. U.S. Customs and Border Protection$1.5M1.3%
    2 awards
  6. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement$1.1M0.9%
    1 awards
  7. Federal Acquisition Service$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$118M99.6%
  2. Construction & real property$515.7K0.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Fairfax County, VA$45.3M38%
  2. Middlesex County, MA$32.7M28%
  3. Hampton city, VA$17.2M15%
  4. Bexar County, TX$8.1M6.8%
  5. Okaloosa County, FL$6.3M5.3%
  6. Santa Barbara County, CA$4.2M3.5%
  7. District of Columbia, DC$1.8M1.5%
  8. Arlington County, VA$1.7M1.5%
  9. Jackson County, MS$701.4K0.6%
  10. Greene County, OH$225K0.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition29%
    US 39% · $34.2M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions29%
    US 8.8% · $34.2M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. ENGINEERING, PROFESSIONAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES (EPASS) SUPPORTING AIR FORCE LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT CENTER (AFLCMC), PEO DIGITAL DIRECTORATE, COMMAND AND CONTROL INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE RECONNAISSANCE (C2ISR) DIVISION (HBG) FOPR #74$92.4M
    Department of the Air Force· Middlesex County, MA· Professional services· Sep 27, 2024 – May 27, 2026· FA872124FB005
  2. US ARMY PM PNT SETA SERVICES SUPPORT$62.4M
    Defense Information Systems Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Dec 16, 2022 – Apr 30, 2026· HC108423F0058
  3. SCAT 1 ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL ASSISTANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT (EPASS) FOR AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND (HQ/AFMC/A4)$55.3M
    Department of the Air Force· Greene County, OH· Professional services· May 25, 2022 – May 20, 2026· FA862222F0001
  4. A2 INTELLIGENCE ADVISORY AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE SUPPORT$50.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Hampton city, VA· Professional services· Mar 29, 2024 – May 18, 2026· FA489024F0042
  5. 9TH AIR FORCE (AFCENT) A2 INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAISSANCE ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES SUPPORT$28M
    Department of the Air Force· Sumter County, SC· Professional services· Aug 14, 2024 – Mar 25, 2026· FA489024F0071
  6. THE SCOPE OF THIS REQUIREMENT IS TO PROVIDE FLIGHT TRAINING OPERATIONS SUPPORT (FTOS) FUNCTIONS TO AETC TRAINING SQUADRONS. FTOS FUNCTIONS INCLUDE STAN/EVAL SUPPORT, TRAINING SUPPORT, AND AIRCREW SCHEDULING/PROGRAMMING SUPPORT.$26.7M
    Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Jun 30, 2023 – Apr 15, 2026· FA300223F0103
  7. USAF NC3 ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES$24.1M
    Federal Acquisition Service· Middlesex County, MA· Professional services· Sep 15, 2020 – Jul 15, 2026· 47QFNA20F0096
  8. ENGINEERING SUSTAINMENT AND SUPPORT SERVICES FOR THE USCG, C5ISC, COMMAND, CONTROL, AND NAVIGATION PRODUCT LINE (C2PL) ENGINEERING SUSTAINMENT AND SUPPORT SERVICES.$19.7M
    U.S. Coast Guard· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Aug 31, 2023 – Aug 24, 2026· 70Z04423FC2PL0010

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $1.8M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $3.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $1.2M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

6 companies · $6.2M reported

  1. VERSAR, INC.$2.8M
    WASHINGTON, DC · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CICONIX, LLC$1.5M
    ANNAPOLIS, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SUMARIA SYSTEMS, LLC$669.9K
    BEAVERCREEK, OH · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NATIONAL AEROSPACE SOLUTIONS, LLC$290.6M
    RESTON, VA · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. DELTA SOLUTIONS & STRATEGIES LLC$173.2M−89% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RELIANCE TEST & TECHNOLOGY, LLC$587.7M−25% in FY2026
    CRESTVIEW, FL · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.