Federal contractor · CRESTVIEW, FL
RELIANCE TEST & TECHNOLOGY, LLC
RELIANCE TEST & TECHNOLOGY, LLC received $164.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−25% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.7B. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($92.6M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $164.3M
- New awards
- 3
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- LFMMBZEMM2X3
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 140.1MFY2017
- 172.2MFY2018
- 114.3MFY2019
- 140MFY2020
- 137.2MFY2021
- 182.6MFY2022
- 195.5MFY2023
- 203.3MFY2024
- 220.1MFY2025
- 164.3MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$92.6M56%1 awards
- Department of the Navy$71.7M44%1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$92.6M56%
- Research & development$71.7M44%
Where the work was performed
- Okaloosa County, FL$92.6M56%
- St. Mary's County, MD$71.7M44%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Professional services· Oct 1, 2016 – May 5, 2026· FA248616C0002
- Department of the Navy· St. Mary's County, MD· Research & development· Sep 1, 2020 – Jun 11, 2026· N0042120C0033
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FE805
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
- Sub-contracts: $5.3M (12 subawards)
5 sub-recipients
- RCS SERVICES, LLC$3.5M66%CALIFORNIA, MD · 3 subawards
- CALIFORNIA, MD · 1 subaward
- SUMMIT TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC$587.5K11%COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 3 subawards
- CGW TECHNOLOGIES INC$526.3K9.9%GREAT MILLS, MD · 4 subawards
- OFFSHORE AVIATION LLC$110.7K2.1%PINEY POINT, MD · 1 subaward
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
Its reported sub-contracts equal 3.2% of its FY2026 contract obligations.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $5.3M paid out · $0 received
- FY2022: $15.3M paid out · $0 received
- FY2023: $16.6M paid out · $0 received
- FY2024: $18.3M paid out · $0 received
- FY2025: $11M paid out · $0 received
- FY2026: $5.3M paid out · $0 received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
54 companies · $71.9M reported
- RCS SERVICES, LLC$17.1MCALIFORNIA, MD · 22 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- AIRTEC, INC.$14MCALIFORNIA, MD · 30 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 38 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes that pay it
No prime reported paying it.
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- RESTON, VA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- INDUS TECHNOLOGY INC$209.8M−20% in FY2026SAN DIEGO, CA · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- CREDENCE DYNAMO SOLUTIONS LLC$367.2M−26% in FY2026VIENNA, VA · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.