Federal contractor · ASHBURN, VA

CUBIC DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE INC

CUBIC DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE INC received $14.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−30% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $156.6M. Its largest customer was Defense Information Systems Agency ($14.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.7M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
LR9SPMKALV71
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10.8MFY2017
  2. 9.6MFY2018
  3. 11.3MFY2019
  4. 16.1MFY2020
  5. 15.8MFY2021
  6. 20.1MFY2022
  7. 20.7MFY2023
  8. 16.5MFY2024
  9. 21MFY2025
  10. 14.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$14.7M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $14.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $14.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Information Systems Agency· Anne Arundel County, MD· IT & telecom· Feb 7, 2020 – May 21, 2026· HC102820F0135

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $8.7M (3 subawards)

3 primes

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  2. SPARKS, NV · 1 subaward
  3. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $438K received
  • FY2022: $600.8K paid out · $4.4M received
  • FY2023: $692.1K paid out · $24.6M received
  • FY2024: $359.4K paid out · $15.3M received
  • FY2025: $632.6K paid out · $3.4M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $8.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $2.3M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. LEBANON, NH · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. GULF PROJECT SOLUTIONS GENERAL TRADING & CONTRACTING CO/EZZ YAQOUB & PARTNERS$248.3K
    SALMIYA, KWT · 4 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

9 companies · $57M reported

  1. WARNER ROBINS, GA · 6 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 9 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. RESTON, VA · 22 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FALLS CHURCH, VA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  2. OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS INC.$60.6M+56% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MONTGOMERY, AL · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.