Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION received $204.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 36 awards (−61% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.3B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($170.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$204.6M
New awards
36
Sole-source
8.9%
Single offer
2.8%
UEI
M227DFMCJY67
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $204.6M in FY2026 together.

  1. INTUITIVE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATIONHUNTSVILLE, AL · Family page
    $204.6M
  2. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 143.1MFY2017
  2. 174MFY2018
  3. 192.2MFY2019
  4. 172.9MFY2020
  5. 252.6MFY2021
  6. 161.5MFY2022
  7. 247.6MFY2023
  8. 192.5MFY2024
  9. 519.2MFY2025
  10. 204.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 18 awards
  2. 11 awards
  3. 6 awards
  4. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$104.8M51%
  2. Research & development$100M49%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition12%
    US 39% · $23.8M
  • Sole-source awards8.9%
    US 30% · $18.1M
  • Single-offer competitions2.8%
    US 8.7% · $5.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Oct 17, 2017 – Apr 28, 2026· 0014
  2. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Jun 5, 2020 – Mar 3, 2026· W31P4Q20FB003
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Madison County, AL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 30, 2025 – Nov 25, 2025· SPRRA225C0014
  4. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Sep 22, 2023 – Jun 4, 2026· W31P4Q23F0309
  5. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2024 – May 28, 2026· W31P4Q25F0049
  6. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Nov 3, 2016 – Apr 7, 2026· 0006
  7. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Feb 17, 2023 – Jun 10, 2026· W31P4Q23FC001
  8. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Professional services· Sep 25, 2025 – May 12, 2026· W31P4Q25F0279

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $17M (18 subawards)

14 sub-recipients

  1. ASHBURN, VA · 1 subaward
  2. GEO-SPATIAL SOLUTIONS INC$3.5M20%
    OMAHA, NE · 3 subawards
  3. NICEVILLE, FL · 1 subaward
  4. BERGENFIELD, NJ · 3 subawards
  5. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  6. MOORESVILLE, NC · 1 subaward
  7. FAYETTEVILLE, AR · 1 subaward
  8. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  9. GERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward
  10. EAST HARTFORD, CT · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: -$88.7K (1 subaward)

1 prime

Its reported sub-contracts equal 8.3% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $218.6M paid out · $41.3M received
  • FY2022: $86.9M paid out · $59.9M received
  • FY2023: $239.9M paid out · $5.9M received
  • FY2024: $266M paid out · $31.2M received
  • FY2025: $132.5M paid out · $5.1M received
  • FY2026: $17M paid out · -$88.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

244 companies · $1.1B reported

  1. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 10 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. FAIRFAX, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

17 companies · $148.9M reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 9 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. HOUSTON, TX · 7 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. HUNTSVILLE, AL · 21 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INTREPID LLC$455M−97% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 47% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development services
  2. MAG DS CORP$351.9M−33% in FY2026
    TINTON FALLS, NJ · 4 entities · 33% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. TORCH TECHNOLOGIES INC$1.8B−26% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 2 entities · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.