Federal contractor · RAMONA, OK
CURTIS HINKLE
CURTIS HINKLE received $814.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−51% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $10.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($814.3K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $814.3K
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- CS7VKBKNLWW3
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 751KFY2017
- 757.8KFY2018
- 753.9KFY2019
- 766.2KFY2020
- 1.1MFY2021
- 1.1MFY2022
- 1.2MFY2023
- 1.4MFY2024
- 1.7MFY2025
- 814.3KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$814.3K100%6 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$675.2K83%
- Construction & real property$139.1K17%
Where the work was performed
- Tulsa County, OK$348.2K43%
- Washington County, OK$262.6K32%
- Sequoyah County, OK$147K18%
- Oklahoma County, OK$36.3K4.5%
- Le Flore County, OK$20.1K2.5%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- KEYSTONE PCMC SERVICES$608.8KDepartment of the Army· Tulsa County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Jun 20, 2025 – May 18, 2026· W912BV25PA014
- COPAN AND HULAH LAKES PCMC$262.6KDepartment of the Army· Washington County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Feb 20, 2026 – Feb 20, 2026· W912BV26PA021
- Department of the Army· Sequoyah County, OK· Construction & real property· Mar 30, 2026 – Mar 30, 2026· W912BV26PA041
- Department of the Army· Oklahoma County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Feb 28, 2024 – May 18, 2026· W912BV24P0012
- Department of the Army· Le Flore County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Mar 7, 2024 – Mar 6, 2026· W912BV24P0014
- Department of the Army· Sequoyah County, OK· Facilities & utilities· Mar 6, 2025 – Mar 18, 2026· W912BV25P0025
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- SERVICE COMPANY WOLFGANG KIESLICH & CO. GMBH$4.1M−34% in FY2026LAMPERTHEIM, DEU · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
- KIRA FACILITIES MAINTENANCE LLC$4.2M−100% in FY2026LYNNWOOD, WA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
- GREENFIELD INTERNATIONAL CORP.$3.7M−13% in FY2026WOODBRIDGE, VA · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.