Federal contractor · WOODBRIDGE, VA

GREENFIELD INTERNATIONAL CORP.

GREENFIELD INTERNATIONAL CORP. received $1.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 40 awards (−13% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.2M
New awards
40
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
10%
UEI
F839PKJPFLZ4
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 334.4KFY2017
  2. 490.8KFY2018
  3. 280.1KFY2019
  4. 233.3KFY2020
  5. 555.3KFY2021
  6. 527.3KFY2022
  7. 1.1MFY2023
  8. 1.1MFY2024
  9. 1.4MFY2025
  10. 1.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 40 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$1.2M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition10%
    US 39% · $120.4K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions10%
    US 8.7% · $120.4K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· DuPage County, IL· Facilities & utilities· May 15, 2023 – May 18, 2026· W912QR23F0150
  2. Department of the Army· Wayne County, MI· Facilities & utilities· May 16, 2023 – May 20, 2026· W912QR23F0163
  3. Department of the Army· Boyle County, KY· Facilities & utilities· May 18, 2023 – May 28, 2026· W912QR23F0169
  4. Department of the Army· Williamson County, IL· Facilities & utilities· May 17, 2023 – May 28, 2026· W912QR23F0161
  5. Department of the Army· DuPage County, IL· Facilities & utilities· May 17, 2023 – May 21, 2026· W912QR23F0164
  6. Department of the Army· St. Clair County, MI· Facilities & utilities· May 12, 2023 – May 18, 2026· W912QR23F0144
  7. Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Facilities & utilities· Apr 9, 2021 – Mar 27, 2026· W912DR21P0030
  8. Department of the Army· Kent County, DE· Facilities & utilities· Apr 7, 2021 – Mar 27, 2026· W912DR21P0027

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $170.3K reported

  1. HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BELTON, TX · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  2. CURTIS HINKLE$3.8M−51% in FY2026
    RAMONA, OK · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings
  3. OSO, INC.$3.2M−100% in FY2026
    SPENCERPORT, NY · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Services to buildings and dwellings

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.