Federal contractor · PORTLAND, OR

CURTISS-WRIGHT DS, INC.

CURTISS-WRIGHT DS, INC. received $10M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (−6.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $127.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($7.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$10M
New awards
15
Sole-source
99.8%
Single offer
0.1%
UEI
P4EGSZ1KNMN9
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the CURTISS-WRIGHT DS, INC. company family: 41 registered entities, $72.6M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. CURTISS-WRIGHT DS, INC.NEWTOWN, PA · Family page
    $7.6M
  2. CURTISS-WRIGHT ELECTRO-MECHANICAL CORPORATIONCHESWICK, PA
    $21.2M
  3. CURTISS-WRIGHT ELECTRO-MECHANICAL CORPCHESAPEAKE, VA
    $11.1M
  4. CURTISS-WRIGHT FLOW CONTROL SERVICE, LLCASTON, PA
    $3.6M
  5. CURTISS-WRIGHT ELECTRO-MECHANICAL CORPORATIONWELLSVILLE, NY
    $3.5M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.7MFY2017
  2. 4.5MFY2018
  3. 4.6MFY2019
  4. 12.6MFY2020
  5. 14.3MFY2021
  6. 15.6MFY2022
  7. 33.5MFY2023
  8. 18.6MFY2024
  9. 10.6MFY2025
  10. 10MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$7.4M74%
    5 awards
  2. Department of State$1.4M14%
    1 awards
  3. Federal Bureau of Investigation$1.2M12%
    3 awards
  4. Department of Defense Education Activity$14.9K0.1%
    1 awards
  5. Department of the Navy$5,2500.1%
    1 awards
  6. Defense Logistics Agency$1,7200.0%
    1 awards
  7. Defense Contract Management Agency$00.0%
    2 awards
  8. Department of the Air Force$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$10M99.9%
  2. Equipment maintenance$5,2500.1%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$1,7200.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Washington County, OR$8.6M86%
  2. District of Columbia, DC$1.4M14%
  3. Alexandria city, VA$14.9K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100.0%
    US 39% · $10M
  • Sole-source awards99.8%
    US 30% · $10M
  • Single-offer competitions0.1%
    US 8.8% · $14.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Army$7.4M
    Department of Defense · 3 awards
  2. Department of State$1.4M
    Department of State · 1 awards
  3. Federal Bureau of Investigation$1.2M
    Department of Justice · 3 awards
  4. Department of the Navy$5,250
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. THIS CONTRACT IS FOR PROCUREMENT OF COMMERCIAL-OFF-THE-SHELF (COTS) SOFTWARE LICENSE SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR CURTISS-WRIGHT PACSTAR SOFTWARE RENEWALS.$9.3M
    Department of the Army· Washington County, OR· IT & telecom· Sep 12, 2025 – Nov 24, 2025· W58P0525C0005
  2. PROCUREMENT OF COMMERCIAL OFF THE SHELF PACSTAR IQ-CORE SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTIONS.$6M
    Department of the Army· Washington County, OR· IT & telecom· May 18, 2026 – May 18, 2026· W9128Z26C0001
  3. EQUIPMENT$2M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Washington County, OR· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 8, 2023 – Nov 19, 2025· W91CRB23P5008
  4. BASE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE WIFI UPGRADE$1.5M
    Department of the Air Force· Kern County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 18, 2024 – Dec 4, 2025· FA930124F0187
  5. PURCHASE OF PACSTAR TRAVEL KITS$1.4M
    Department of State· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 7, 2026 – Sep 3, 2026· 19AQMM26P0934
  6. FOREIGN MILITARY SALES (FMS) FIRM FIXED PRICE (FFP) CONTRACT TO SUPPORT MILITARY OPERATIONS IN ROMANIA, RO-B-UGJ, AE24137.$1.2M
    Department of the Army· Washington County, OR· IT & telecom· Dec 22, 2025 – Dec 22, 2025· W91CRB26C5019
  7. PACSTAR DEPLOYMENT FLY-AWAY KITS$1M
    Federal Bureau of Investigation· Washington County, OR· IT & telecom· Mar 12, 2026 – Mar 12, 2026· 15F06726F0000352
  8. THIS IS A FIRM FIXED PRICE CONTRACT UNDER FOREIGN MILITARY SALES (FMS) REQUIREMENT FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF ESTONIA UNDER FMS CASES EN-B--UDO,ARP AE22039.$554K
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Washington County, OR· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 9, 2022 – Nov 19, 2025· W91CRB23C5000

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $990.5K (6 subawards)

3 primes

  1. GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.$513.1K52%
    FAIRFAX, VA · 3 subawards
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$262.4K26%
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward
  3. HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP$215.1K22%
    MC LEAN, VA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $24.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $40.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $56.2M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $24.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $18.6M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $990.5K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

53 companies · $39.1M reported

  1. MACTAGGART, SCOTT & CO. LTD$6M
    LOANHEAD, GBR · 7 subawards · Engine, turbine, and power transmission equipment manufacturing
  2. RIDE INC$5.2M
    WEST GREENWICH, RI · 22 subawards · Engine, turbine, and power transmission equipment manufacturing
  3. EVERSON TESLA INC$3.1M
    NAZARETH, PA · 5 subawards · Electrical equipment manufacturing

Primes that pay it

73 companies · $1.9B reported

  1. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$420.7M
    GROTON, CT · 420 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED$337.2M
    PASCAGOULA, MS · 1,916 subawards · Ship and boat building
  3. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$270M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 310 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 99 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BIRD-JOHNSON PROPELLER COMPANY, LLC$92.5M+31% in FY2026
    WALPOLE, MA · 22% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat buildingNavy · Engine, turbine, and power transmission equipment manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing+1 more
  2. SEEMANN COMPOSITES, LLC$192.9M−51% in FY2026
    GULFPORT, MS · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat buildingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. BRODOGRADILISTE VIKTOR LENAC D.D.$72.3M−11% in FY2026
    RIJEKA, HRV · 17% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Ship and boat building

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of CURTISS-WRIGHT DS, INC. (41 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • CURTISS WRIGHT CORPORATIONAI match · 99%
  • Siemens Government Technologies, INCAI match · 95%
Lobbying · 2025
$500K
12 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.3M
PAC giving · 2026
$17.3K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$210K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$240K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$500K
    12 reports
  4. 2026$360K
    12 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense37 reports
  2. Homeland security13 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations6 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES36 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE34 reports
  3. Defense - Dept of (DOD)15 reports
  4. Army - Dept of (Corps of Engineers)13 reports
  5. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)12 reports
  6. Army - Dept of (Other)11 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. DLA Piper LLP (US)$420K
    14 reports
  2. Corrigan & Ussery LLC$420K
    13 reports
  3. American Defense International, Inc.$370K
    6 reports
  4. Strategic Marketing Innovations$40K
    2 reports
  5. MORAN GLOBAL STRATEGIES, INC.$30K
    2 reports
  6. Steptoe LLP$20K
    1 reports
  7. DIROMA ECK & CO. LLP$10K
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$10.5K61%
  2. Democratic$6,00035%
  3. Other or none$7504.3%

PACs sponsored

  • CURTISS WRIGHT CORPORATION EMPLOYEES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$11K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.