Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX
DARKHIVE INC.
DARKHIVE INC. received $50.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+4,884% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $61M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($50.1M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $50.1M
- New awards
- 4
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- QP43KMDGUKZ7
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 149.4KFY2022
- 7.4MFY2023
- 2.3MFY2024
- 1MFY2025
- 50.1MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$50.1M100%2 awards
- 2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Other equipment & supplies$47.8M95%
- Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$2.3M4.6%
Where the work was performed
- Bexar County, TX$47.8M95%
- Monroe County, PA$2.3M4.6%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 18, 2026 – May 27, 2026· W15P7T26F0042
- Department of the Army· Monroe County, PA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 6, 2026 – Apr 23, 2026· W51AA126FA084
- Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Research & development· Sep 8, 2023 – Feb 12, 2026· FA875023CB003
- Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Research & development· Sep 15, 2025 – Mar 9, 2026· FA228025F0034
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- GRADKELL SYSTEMS INC$53.6M−16% in FY2026HUNTSVILLE, AL · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- ECCALON, LLC$54.8M−6% in FY2026HANOVER, MD · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
- LINTECH-PRAGMATICS JV LLC$43.5M−43% in FY2026RESTON, VA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Lobbying and PAC activity
Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.
Matched organizations
- DarkhiveAI match · 100%
- Lobbying · 2025
- $160K
- 4 reports
- Lobbying · 2023–2026
- $420K
Lobbying by year
- 2023$20K1 reports
- 2024$160K4 reports
- 2025$160K4 reports
- 2026$80K2 reports
Top issues
- Defense11 reports
Who was contacted
- U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES11 reports
- U.S. SENATE11 reports
Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).
Lobbying firms hired
- C2 Strategies$420K11 reports
Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.
Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.
Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.
Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.
Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.