Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

DARKHIVE INC.

DARKHIVE INC. received $50.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (+4,884% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $61M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($50.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$50.1M
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
QP43KMDGUKZ7
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 149.4KFY2022
  2. 7.4MFY2023
  3. 2.3MFY2024
  4. 1MFY2025
  5. 50.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$47.8M95%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$2.3M4.6%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 18, 2026 – May 27, 2026· W15P7T26F0042
  2. Department of the Army· Monroe County, PA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Mar 6, 2026 – Apr 23, 2026· W51AA126FA084
  3. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Research & development· Sep 8, 2023 – Feb 12, 2026· FA875023CB003
  4. Department of the Air Force· Bexar County, TX· Research & development· Sep 15, 2025 – Mar 9, 2026· FA228025F0034

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GRADKELL SYSTEMS INC$53.6M−16% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ECCALON, LLC$54.8M−6% in FY2026
    HANOVER, MD · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. LINTECH-PRAGMATICS JV LLC$43.5M−43% in FY2026
    RESTON, VA · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • DarkhiveAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$160K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$420K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$20K
    1 reports
  2. 2024$160K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$160K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$80K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense11 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES11 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE11 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. C2 Strategies$420K
    11 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.