Federal contractor · SAN ANTONIO, TX

VISTA INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS, LLC

VISTA INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS, LLC received $21.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−13% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $63.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($10.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$21.7M
New awards
6
Sole-source
100.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
QVUUARET28N8
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2023
  2. 15.7MFY2024
  3. 24.8MFY2025
  4. 21.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 3 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$10.9M50%
  2. Professional services$10.9M50%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100.0%
    US 39% · $21.7M
  • Sole-source awards100.0%
    US 30% · $21.7M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Hardin County, KY· IT & telecom· Feb 29, 2024 – May 19, 2026· W519TC24C0011
  2. Defense Health Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jan 30, 2026 – Jan 30, 2026· HT942726CE009
  3. Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Professional services· Jun 12, 2025 – Dec 11, 2025· W519TC25C0034
  4. Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· IT & telecom· Feb 22, 2023 – Feb 13, 2026· W519TC23C0009
  5. Defense Health Agency· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Jan 14, 2025 – Jan 13, 2026· HT942525P0031
  6. Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· HQ085926FG075

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $7.8M paid out · $2.4M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.2M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4 companies · $7.8M reported

  1. BETHESDA, MD · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ROCK ISLAND, IL · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $4.6M reported

  1. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 16 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. SERCO INC$41.4K
    HERNDON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GRADKELL SYSTEMS INC$53.6M−16% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. ECCALON, LLC$54.8M−6% in FY2026
    HANOVER, MD · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. DARKHIVE INC.$53.4M+4,884% in FY2026
    SAN ANTONIO, TX · 81% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.