Federal contractor · WEATHERFORD, TX

DATAMILL LLC

DATAMILL LLC received $265K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (+89% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($265K).

Obligations · FY2026
$265K
New awards
2
Sole-source
53%
Single offer
47%
UEI
YHLBJHNUG6F8
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 384KFY2017
  2. 272KFY2018
  3. 302KFY2019
  4. 120KFY2020
  5. 120KFY2021
  6. 120KFY2022
  7. 120KFY2023
  8. 140KFY2024
  9. 140KFY2025
  10. 265KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$265K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$265K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Parker County, TX$265K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $265K
  • Sole-source awards53%
    US 30% · $140K
  • Single-offer competitions47%
    US 8.8% · $125K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. LDMS PROVIDES LIFECYCLE-TRACKING AND UTILIZES CLIENT/SERVER ARCHITECTURE AND ENCOMPASSES STANDARD LOGISTICS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PROCESSES FOR ALL ASPECTS OF AN OPERATIONS SYSTEM WITH CAPABILITIES THAT ENHANCES SYSTEM MANAGEMENT.$420K
    Department of the Army· Parker County, TX· IT & telecom· Feb 29, 2024 – Feb 24, 2026· W31P4Q24C0027
  2. PURCHASE OF REPAIRDATA SOFTWARE ANNUAL LICENSE FOR THE AN/TPQ-53 RADAR PROGRAM.$125K
    Department of the Army· Parker County, TX· IT & telecom· Jan 27, 2026 – Jan 27, 2026· W56KGY26P0001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $505K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $846.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $785K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $865K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $4M reported

  1. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION$1.6M
    FORT WORTH, TX · 9 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. RAYTHEON COMPANY$1.4M
    TUCSON, AZ · 9 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SIGMATECH INC$470K
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MELKEN SOLUTIONS, LLC$376.7K
    OVIEDO, FL · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  2. J6 MANAGEMENT CONSULTING LLC$727.2K
    SMYRNA, GA · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  3. HLP INTEGRATION, LLC$278.2K−2% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Data processing, hosting, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.