Federal contractor · ORLANDO, FL
DIGNITAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
DIGNITAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC received $7.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 27 awards (−52% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $139.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($4.5M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $7.8M
- New awards
- 27
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 34%
- UEI
- CYLWLLJF1W77
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 8.9MFY2017
- 5.3MFY2018
- 5.6MFY2019
- 12.1MFY2020
- 17MFY2021
- 21.8MFY2022
- 19MFY2023
- 25.8MFY2024
- 16.2MFY2025
- 7.8MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$4.5M58%20 awards
- Department of the Army$3.3M42%6 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Research & development$2.8M36%
- Other equipment & supplies$2M26%
- Professional services$1.3M16%
- Equipment maintenance$1.1M14%
- IT & telecom$583.3K7.5%
Where the work was performed
- Orange County, FL$7.8M100.0%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition34%US 39% · $2.7M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions34%US 8.8% · $2.7M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Orange County, FL· Equipment maintenance· May 22, 2024 – May 7, 2026· W900KK24F0100
- Department of the Army· Orange County, FL· Research & development· Jul 31, 2023 – Jan 8, 2026· W912CG23C0017
- Department of the Army· Orange County, FL· Research & development· Jun 9, 2020 – Mar 27, 2026· W912CG20C0021
- Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· Professional services· Aug 8, 2024 – Jun 4, 2026· N6449824F3095
- Department of the Army· Orange County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Jun 26, 2025 – May 28, 2026· W900KK25FA073
- Department of the Army· Orange County, FL· Research & development· Jul 2, 2025 – Jun 4, 2026· W912CG25CA022
- Department of the Navy· Orange County, FL· Research & development· Nov 27, 2024 – Mar 17, 2026· N6833525C0085
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.5M received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $5.1M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $44.1M received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $8.7M received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
4 companies · $60.6M reported
- PASCAGOULA, MS · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- FORT WORTH, TX · 47 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
- LEIDOS, INC.$1.1MRESTON, VA · 12 subawards · Commercial and service industry machinery manufacturing
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- DYNAMIC ANIMATION SYSTEMS, INC.$21.1M−83% in FY2026MC LEAN, VA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
- TECHNICAL DATA ANALYSIS, INC.$19.4M−52% in FY2026FALLS CHURCH, VA · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
- EPS CORPORATION$67.5M−60% in FY2026TINTON FALLS, NJ · 2 entities · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.