Federal contractor · KNOXVILLE, TN

DPRA INCORPORATED

DPRA INCORPORATED received $446K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (+62% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $65.5M. Its largest customer was U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ($392.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$446K
New awards
9
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
88%
UEI
E7ZBN7JMNKY9
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.5MFY2017
  2. 5.6MFY2018
  3. 10.8MFY2019
  4. 9.2MFY2020
  5. 8MFY2021
  6. 9.5MFY2022
  7. 9.2MFY2023
  8. 4.1MFY2024
  9. 275.2KFY2025
  10. 446KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 6 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$445.8K99.9%
  2. Research & development$5000.1%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition88%
    US 39% · $392.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions88%
    US 8.8% · $392.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Sep 21, 2023 – Dec 16, 2025· 140FNR23F0009
  2. Environmental Protection Agency· Suffolk County, MA· Facilities & utilities· Dec 9, 2021 – May 5, 2026· 68HE0122F0005
  3. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Williamson County, IL· Facilities & utilities· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 140FS226F0148
  4. Environmental Protection Agency· Dallas County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Jan 15, 2025 – Mar 3, 2026· 68HE0625F0002
  5. Environmental Protection Agency· Denver County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jun 16, 2023 – Apr 2, 2026· 68HE0823F0010
  6. Environmental Protection Agency· Suffolk County, MA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 16, 2022 – May 5, 2026· 68HE0122F0028
  7. Environmental Protection Agency· Facilities & utilities· Jun 5, 2024 – Jan 7, 2026· 68HE0924F0070
  8. Environmental Protection Agency· Denver County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Dec 31, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025· 68HE0826F0007

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $195.2K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $127.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $519.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $842.2K reported

  1. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  2. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 2 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. REVTEK SOLUTIONS LLC$3.8M+207,520% in FY2026
    LEESBURG, VA · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveUSTRANSCOM · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CONSTRUCTIVE CONFLICT LLC$1.7M−100% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.