Federal contractor · COLORADO SPRINGS, CO

DSOFT TECHNOLOGY COMPANY

DSOFT TECHNOLOGY COMPANY received $311.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−81% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $61.3M. Its largest customer was Federal Aviation Administration ($311.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$311.8K
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
W9VKXF63ENM1
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 777.4KFY2017
  2. 6.1MFY2018
  3. 8.8MFY2019
  4. 7.4MFY2020
  5. 12.1MFY2021
  6. 9.8MFY2022
  7. 10.3MFY2023
  8. 4.1MFY2024
  9. 1.7MFY2025
  10. 311.8KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Federal Aviation Administration$311.8K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$311.8K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. El Paso County, CO$311.8K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE HIGH-QUALITY SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING: PROVIDING SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL, AND ENGINEERING EXPERTISE IN THE AREA HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH AND HUMAN-CENTERED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPING, VALIDATING$1.7M
    Federal Aviation Administration· El Paso County, CO· Research & development· Oct 30, 2023 – Aug 22, 2026· 692M1524F00003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $110.6K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $42K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $207.1K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $124.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

4 companies · $484.1K reported

  1. L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.$219.8K
    GREENVILLE, TX · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC$207.1K
    MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC$42K
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SYSTEMS ATLANTA INC$4.5M−50% in FY2026
    KENNESAW, GA · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesFederal Aviation Administration · Computer systems design and related services
  2. SPACE COAST INTELLIGENT SOLUTIONS INC$4.3M+15% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services
  3. NARA LOGICS INC$4.3M0% in FY2026
    BOSTON, MA · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.