Federal contractor · BURLINGAME, CA

ECC EXPEDITIONARY CONSTRUCTORS LLC

ECC EXPEDITIONARY CONSTRUCTORS LLC received $5,000 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2025: $116.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($5,000).

Obligations · FY2026
$5,000
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
JMBTM98SWEM4
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ECC CONSTRUCTORS LLC company family: 3 registered entities, -$126.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ECC CONSTRUCTORS LLCBURLINGAME, CA · Family page
    -$126.5M
  2. ECC CENTCOM CONSTRUCTORS LLCBURLINGAME, CA
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 116.4MFY2025
  2. 5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$5,000100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$5,000100%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Diego County, CA$5,000100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $5,000
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $5,000
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. FY25 MCON P-2301 HSC-25 COMPLEX AT THE ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE, GUAM, MARIANA ISLANDS$116.3M
    Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Sep 17, 2025 – Nov 21, 2025· N6274225F9944
  2. OBLIGATE MINIMUM GUARANTEE$5,000
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Feb 5, 2026 – Feb 5, 2026· N6247326F0167

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ASHBRITT INC$1.8B−102% in FY2026
    DEERFIELD BEACH, FL · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection
  2. BECHTEL PARSONS BLUE GRASS, A JOINT VENTURE$765.2M−95% in FY2026
    RICHMOND, KY · 8.7% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste treatment and disposal
  3. TMSAB LLC$170M−100% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 7.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Waste collection

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.