Federal contractor · RESTON, VA

ELZLY TECHNOLOGY CORP

ELZLY TECHNOLOGY CORP received $1.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+337% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $10.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($2.3M). It also received $74.6K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$1.9M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CQDFJM6JYQN3
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.6MFY2017
  2. 3.2MFY2018
  3. 3.1MFY2019
  4. 0FY2020
  5. -2.7KFY2021
  6. 382.3KFY2022
  7. 13.8KFY2023
  8. 40.4KFY2024
  9. 446.1KFY2025
  10. 1.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$2.3M100%
    1 awards
  2. Bureau of Reclamation$18.8K1.0%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Army-$362.4K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$2.3M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Montgomery County, MD$2.3M100%
  2. Jefferson County, CO$18.8K1.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. CORROSION CONTROL ASSISTANCE TEAMS (CCAT) SUPPORT IN THE EXECUTION OF PROVIDING SUPPORT AND ASSISTANCE TO SHIPS FORCE FOR CORROSION CONTROL AND PRESERVATION EFFORTS.$2.3M
    Department of the Navy· Montgomery County, MD· Professional services· May 22, 2026 – May 22, 2026· N0016726F3101
  2. THIS EFFORT COMPLIES WITH CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE LABORATORY TESTING PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT IAW BASE CONTRACT SECTION C.1.1 AND C.4.$38.3K
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Research & development· May 8, 2025 – Apr 23, 2026· W912CH25F0263
  3. TSC PEER REVIEW - CORROSION MITIGATION$18.8K
    Bureau of Reclamation· Jefferson County, CO· Professional services· Feb 19, 2026 – Feb 19, 2026· 140R4026P0014

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

ELZLY TECHNOLOGY CORP received $74.6K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (0 new awards), +96% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 12.431 · Basic Scientific Research ($74.6K).

Assistance · FY2026
$74.6K
New awards
0
Actions
2
Since FY2021
$1.7M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 303.1KFY2021
  2. 268.8KFY2022
  3. 545.4KFY2023
  4. 475.4KFY2024
  5. 38KFY2025
  6. 74.6KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$74.6K100%

Top programs

  1. 12.431 · Basic Scientific Research$74.6K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of the Army$74.6K100%
    Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. CORROSION INVESTIGATION AND MODELING$2.1M
    12.431 · Basic Scientific Research· Department of the Army· Cooperative agreement· May 5, 2021 – Aug 12, 2026· W911NF2020068

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $2.1M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR MANUFACTURING SCIENCES INC$2.1M100%
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $49.5K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $2.1M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $2.1M reported

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR MANUFACTURING SCIENCES INC$2.1M
    ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  2. NOBLIS, INC.$49.5K
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. REID MIDDLETON, INC.$2.5M+484% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MULTI-MAC JV$3M−89% in FY2026
    YUMA, AZ · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. TRIBOLOGIK CORP$3.2M−99% in FY2026
    HAMMOND, IN · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesBureau of Reclamation · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.