Federal contractor · TINLEY PARK, IL

EMCORE CHICAGO INERTIAL CORPORATION

EMCORE CHICAGO INERTIAL CORPORATION received $731K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−33% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.6M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($778.5K).

Obligations · FY2026
$731K
New awards
4
Sole-source
95%
Single offer
5.0%
UEI
T6FJQXNNZ5L8
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 350FY2017
  2. 112.3KFY2018
  3. 133.7KFY2019
  4. -350FY2020
  5. 2KFY2023
  6. 1.5MFY2024
  7. 1.1MFY2025
  8. 731KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$705.7K97%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$25.3K3.5%

Where the work was performed

  1. Will County, IL$742.3K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $731K
  • Sole-source awards95%
    US 30% · $694.3K
  • Single-offer competitions5.0%
    US 8.7% · $36.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Kendall County, IL· IT & telecom· Nov 5, 2025 – Apr 1, 2026· SPRDL126C0020
  2. Department of the Navy· Cook County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Jun 27, 2025 – Feb 25, 2026· N0010425PUC36
  3. Department of the Navy· Will County, IL· IT & telecom· Jun 24, 2025 – May 6, 2026· N0010425PUC13
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Will County, IL· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2025· SPE7M026P0504

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $41.1K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. YORK, PA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $193.1K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $32.3K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $4.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $4.6M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $7.8M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $41.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $17.5M reported

  1. YORK, PA · 6 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 8 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MISSION ANALYTICS LLC$2.6M+52% in FY2026
    FALLS CHURCH, VA · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Communications equipment manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
  2. COMROD INC$1.9M+38% in FY2026
    WESTLAKE, OH · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Communications equipment manufacturingNavy · Communications equipment manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  3. DENKE LABORATORIES, INC.$2.5M−4.1% in FY2026
    PALMETTO, FL · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Communications equipment manufacturingNavy · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • EMCORE CorporationAI match · 91%
Lobbying · 2024
$45K
6 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2025
$90K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$30K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$45K
    6 reports
  3. 2025$15K
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense5 reports
  2. Manufacturing1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE5 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP$30K
    6 reports

2 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.