Federal contractor · CLINTON, MS

ENHANCED ENVIRONMENTAL & EMERGENCY SERVICES INC

ENHANCED ENVIRONMENTAL & EMERGENCY SERVICES INC received -$92.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 26 awards (−102% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $14.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($343.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$92.2K
New awards
26
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
GLEKLKBGXX26
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 246.3KFY2019
  2. 2MFY2020
  3. 265.2KFY2021
  4. 164.3KFY2022
  5. 2.4MFY2023
  6. 4MFY2024
  7. 5.1MFY2025
  8. -92.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 17 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 4 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 2 awards
  2. Department of Homeland Security · 13 awards
  3. Department of Justice · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Shelby County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Aug 24, 2023 – Oct 10, 2025· W912EE23P0099
  2. Department of the Navy· Kleberg County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Oct 10, 2025 – Feb 3, 2026· N6945026F0025
  3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Hinds County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Dec 18, 2024 – Apr 22, 2026· 1333MK25P0026
  4. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Hinds County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Dec 15, 2023 – Nov 21, 2025· 1333MK24P0021
  5. U.S. Coast Guard· Brazoria County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Mar 6, 2026 – Jul 10, 2026· 70Z08426FGALV0003
  6. U.S. Coast Guard· Orleans Parish, LA· Facilities & utilities· Feb 10, 2026 – Apr 16, 2026· 70Z08426FNEWO0007
  7. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Harrison County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Jan 13, 2026 – Jan 13, 2026· 1333MK26P0011
  8. U.S. Coast Guard· Escambia County, FL· Facilities & utilities· Aug 4, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 70Z08426FATCM0038

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.4M (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. NEW ORLEANS, LA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $75.8K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $62.9K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.4M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $1.5M reported

  1. GREENVILLE, SC · 3 subawards · Facilities support services
  2. CRESTVIEW, FL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 9 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DEL MAR-TREVET-JV LLC$6.3M−34% in FY2026
    CHULA VISTA, CA · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Remediation and other waste management services
  2. BUDA, TX · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. OXNARD, CA · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Remediation and other waste management servicesAir Force · Remediation and other waste management services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.