Federal contractor · ANCHORAGE, AK

ENTERPRISE ENGINEERING, INC.

ENTERPRISE ENGINEERING, INC. received $3.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 17 awards (−92% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $152.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.3M
New awards
17
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
31%
UEI
WZTQYTDQLVM8
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 12.9MFY2017
  2. 7.6MFY2018
  3. 4.5MFY2019
  4. 18.2MFY2020
  5. 8.5MFY2021
  6. 10MFY2022
  7. 20.6MFY2023
  8. 23.4MFY2024
  9. 43.8MFY2025
  10. 3.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$2.2M66%
    7 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$1.6M49%
    6 awards
  3. Department of the Air Force-$486.2K0.0%
    4 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$3.3M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Honolulu County, HI$1.1M35%
  2. Anchorage Municipality, AK$970.4K29%
  3. Ventura County, CA$933K28%
  4. Abroad$564.9K17%
  5. United States$123.4K3.7%
  6. San Diego County, CA$115K3.5%
  7. Aleutians West Census Area, AK$73K2.2%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition31%
    US 39% · $1M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions31%
    US 8.8% · $1M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. PIPELINES INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE ATSUGI (ATS), TSURUMI (TSU). OCONUS$3.5M
    Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2024 – Apr 21, 2026· N3943024F4223
  2. INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE AND IN-LINE INSPECTION SMART PIGGING WORK AT NAVSUP FLEET LOGISTICS CENTER JACKSONVILLE, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.$2.3M
    Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Aug 8, 2023 – Nov 13, 2025· N3943023F4642
  3. INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT PLAN ASSESSMENT OF DLA-ENERGY FUELS FACILITIES AT EGLIN AFB, FL, DUKE FIELD, FL, LUKE AFB, AZ, GILA BEND AFAF, AZ, BEALE AFB, CA, HURLBURT AFB, FL, HILL AFB, UT, UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE, MOUNTAIN HOME AFB, ID$2M
    Department of the Air Force· Yuba County, CA· Construction & real property· May 24, 2023 – Apr 30, 2026· FA890323F0062
  4. OSI TANK 18 & 19 / ISI TANK 12$1.4M
    Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· Sep 20, 2024 – Dec 16, 2025· N3943024F4234
  5. FY27 KWAJ POWER PLANT (PP) REPAIR POL TANK AND PIPING SYSTEM KWAJALEIN ATOLL, REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS$1.2M
    Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Construction & real property· Apr 1, 2026 – Apr 1, 2026· W9128A26FA013
  6. X036 ENC 2&3 MT. ABERNATHY FULL DSN REPLACE MIRAMAR PIPELINE N$1M
    Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Feb 1, 2024 – Jun 4, 2026· N6247324F4181
  7. JBE081 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES$970.4K
    Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Construction & real property· May 29, 2026 – May 29, 2026· W911KB26FA053
  8. OUT-OF-SERVICE (OOS) AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE (API) 653 INSPECTIONS OF ONE MILITARY UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) AND IN-SERVICE (IS) INSPECTION OF SIX MILITARY ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS (AST) AT DFSP GUAM.$933K
    Department of the Navy· Ventura County, CA· Construction & real property· Apr 13, 2026 – Apr 13, 2026· N3943026F2005

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $157.9K (3 subawards)

2 primes

  1. HDR - WTNA JV$157.9K100%
    HONOLULU, HI · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $5.3M received
  • FY2023: $83.2K paid out · $1.4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.2M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $5.3M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $157.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $83.2K reported

  1. NANSEKI KAIHATSU CO.,LTD.$83.2K
    NAKAGAMI-GUN, JPN · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $14.4M reported

  1. PERATON INC.$4.9M
    HERNDON, VA · 3 subawards · Utility system construction
  2. CH2M HILL, INC$4M
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 19 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HDR ENVIRONMENTAL, OPERATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, INC.$3M
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 6 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. POND-BAKER JV$56.2M−83% in FY2026
    NORCROSS, GA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. KALMAN & COMPANY, INC.$88.2M−53% in FY2026
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. VISION POINT SYSTEMS, INC.$61.7M−19% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 78% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.