Federal contractor · VIRGINIA BEACH, VA

KALMAN & COMPANY, INC.

KALMAN & COMPANY, INC. received $15M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−53% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $304M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($11.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$15M
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
18%
UEI
ZZEVED8VGHS6
Parent company
KALMAN & COMPANY, INC.
Other than small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 25.8MFY2017
  2. 27MFY2018
  3. 30.5MFY2019
  4. 26.9MFY2020
  5. 27.2MFY2021
  6. 37.3MFY2022
  7. 41.2MFY2023
  8. 41.4MFY2024
  9. 31.8MFY2025
  10. 15MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$11.5M77%
    5 awards
  2. Environmental Protection Agency$2.6M18%
    1 awards
  3. Department of the Army$862.9K5.7%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$15M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Virginia Beach city, VA$12.1M80%
  2. Dallas County, TX$2.6M18%
  3. Stafford County, VA$231.4K1.5%
  4. Prince William County, VA$123K0.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition18%
    US 39% · $2.6M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions18%
    US 8.7% · $2.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS LIFE SUPPORT BRANCH READINESS SUPPORT SERVICES$73.8M
    Department of the Navy· Virginia Beach city, VA· Professional services· Oct 20, 2021 – Jun 5, 2026· N6133122F3001
  2. EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS LIFE SUPPORT DIVISION READINESS SUPPORT SERVICES$63M
    Department of the Navy· Virginia Beach city, VA· Professional services· Jan 9, 2017 – Nov 7, 2025· HR01
  3. PM MHTV PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES$17.7M
    Department of the Navy· Prince William County, VA· Professional services· May 21, 2021 – May 18, 2026· M6785421F3007
  4. THE SCOPE OF THIS EFFORT IS TO PROVIDE COST AND ANALYTIC SUPPORT TO MARINE CORPS SYSTEMS COMMAND (MARCORSYSCOM) AND PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICER (PEO) LAND SYSTEMS (LS) IN SUPPORT OF ACQUISITION CATEGORY (ACAT) I-IV AND ABBREVIATED ACQUISITION PROGRAMS (AAP) WITHIN THE COMMANDS PROGRAM OFFICES (PO).$11.8M
    Department of the Navy· Virginia Beach city, VA· Professional services· Dec 5, 2016 – Jun 1, 2026· MU61
  5. GS-00F-343CA/68HERH21F0172 AIRBORNE SPECTRAL PHOTOMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL COLLECTION TECHNOLOGY (ASPECT), DATA PROCESSING, DEVELOPMENT AND SENSOR SUPPORT SERVICES (DPDS)$10.6M
    Environmental Protection Agency· Dallas County, TX· Professional services· Jul 7, 2021 – Jul 23, 2026· 68HERH21F0172
  6. PM MHTV REQUIRES CONTRACTOR SUPPORT POSSESSING THE TECHNICAL ACUMEN TO ASSIST IN PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING SERVICES.$5.9M
    Department of the Navy· Stafford County, VA· Professional services· May 25, 2023 – May 21, 2026· M6785423F3005
  7. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES$4.9M
    Department of the Army· Virginia Beach city, VA· Professional services· May 22, 2025 – May 20, 2026· W911QY25FA043

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $4.4M paid out · $27.9M received
  • FY2022: $7.2M paid out · $4.9M received
  • FY2023: $1.2M paid out · $3.1M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $16.7M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $7.6M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $12.7M reported

  1. GRYPHON TECHNOLOGIES, L.C.$7.2M
    WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. THE SURVICE ENGINEERING COMPANY LLC$3.9M
    BELCAMP, MD · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SPECTRAL SYSTEMS INTEGRATION, LLC$1.2M
    STAFFORD, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $60.1M reported

  1. BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLC$26.9M
    IDAHO FALLS, ID · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. CHEROKEE NATION MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING, L.L.C..$19.7M
    TULSA, OK · 6 subawards · Warehousing and storage
  3. DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING SYSTEM SOLUTIONS PROVIDER, INC$5.9M
    HERNDON, VA · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ENTERPRISE ENGINEERING, INC.$70.5M−92% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. POND-BAKER JV$56.2M−83% in FY2026
    NORCROSS, GA · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. VISION POINT SYSTEMS, INC.$61.7M−19% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 66% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.