Federal contractor · PLYMOUTH, MI

EOTECH, LLC

EOTECH, LLC received $354.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−96% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $35.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($339.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$354.2K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
6.4%
UEI
JP2KA5LK3K83
Parent company
PROJECT ECHO, LLC
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.3MFY2017
  2. 634.5KFY2018
  3. 5.8MFY2019
  4. -183.4KFY2020
  5. 3.2MFY2021
  6. 4.1MFY2022
  7. 7.8MFY2023
  8. 3.1MFY2024
  9. 8.2MFY2025
  10. 354.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$339.8K96%
    1 awards
  2. U.S. Marshals Service$22.8K6.4%
    1 awards
  3. Missile Defense Agency$5000.1%
    1 awards
  4. Defense Contract Management Agency$00.0%
    1 awards
  5. Department of the Army-$8,9460.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$340.3K96%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$13.8K3.9%

Where the work was performed

  1. Wayne County, MI$330.9K93%
  2. Rapides Parish, LA$22.8K6.4%
  3. Madison County, AL$5000.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition3.9%
    US 39% · $13.8K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$8,946
  • Single-offer competitions6.4%
    US 8.8% · $22.8K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THIS CONTRACT, W58RGZ-15-C-0045 IS AWARDED TO INTEVAC PHOTONICS, INC FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC IMAGE INTENSIFIER (EI2) SHIP-SET FOR LOT 4, APACHE AH-64D/E PROGRAM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH (IAW) THE STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW) LOCATED IN SECTION C, OF THIS CONTRACT. THE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (POP) FOR THIS EFFORT, IS 32 MONTHS AFTER CONTRACT AWARD.$19.7M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Santa Clara County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Dec 22, 2016 – May 12, 2026· W58RGZ15C0052
  2. BEAM CONTROL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (BCRD)$10.1M
    Department of the Air Force· Wayne County, MI· Research & development· Mar 17, 2021 – May 22, 2026· FA945121C0029
  3. PURPOSE OF THIS ORDER IS TO ACQUIRE FIRMWARE REPAIR AND UPGRADES.$212K
    Department of the Army· Wayne County, MI· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 24, 2024 – May 5, 2026· W58RGZ24F0311
  4. MISSION CRITICAL - APPREHENDING FUGITIVES SOG: VUDU RIFLE SCOPES CF: APC-FY26-000309$22.8K
    U.S. Marshals Service· Rapides Parish, LA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 7, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026· 15M10226PA4700287
  5. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FG370

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $70K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC., THE$70K100%
    CAMBRIDGE, MA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $22.8M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $534.8K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $70K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $29.7M reported

  1. ATLANTIC DIVING SUPPLY, INC.$21.3M
    VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 17 subawards · Machinery, equipment, and supplies merchant wholesalers
  2. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$5.9M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 58 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. RAYTHEON COMPANY$1.5M
    TUCSON, AZ · 1 subaward · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHRONOS AVIATION LLC$6.7M+32,196% in FY2026
    ROCKFORD, IL · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. AERO ENGINEERING SUPPORT GROUP INC$10.6M+140% in FY2026
    KISSIMMEE, FL · 58% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. ZDEN TECHNOLOGIES LLC$5.2M+36% in FY2026
    MIDWEST CITY, OK · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesU.S. Special Operations Command · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • EOTECHAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2026
$90K
2 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$240K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$60K
    3 reports
  2. 2025$90K
    2 reports
  3. 2026$90K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense7 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES7 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE7 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. FRONTERA GROUP$180K
    4 reports
  2. Strategic Marketing Innovations$60K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.