Federal contractor · WEAVERVILLE, NC

EPSILON INC

EPSILON INC received $62M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (−58% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $473.5M. Its largest customer was Office of the Chief Financial Officer ($25.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$62M
New awards
15
Sole-source
4.7%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JY5SWCCPG5L7
Parent company
AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION company family: 5 registered entities, $282.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONMCLEAN, VA · Family page
    $220.5M
  2. AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONSAN DIEGO, CA
    $0
  3. DDL OMNI ENGINEERING LLCMC LEAN, VA
    $0
  4. EMSOLUTIONS, INC.ARLINGTON, VA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10.3MFY2017
  2. 11.8MFY2018
  3. 9.7MFY2019
  4. 8.8MFY2020
  5. 38.9MFY2021
  6. 45.3MFY2022
  7. 65.3MFY2023
  8. 73.5MFY2024
  9. 147.9MFY2025
  10. 62MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Office of the Chief Financial Officer$25.2M41%
    2 awards
  2. Department of Energy$15.2M24%
    2 awards
  3. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office$11.1M18%
    3 awards
  4. Department of the Navy$10.6M17%
    6 awards
  5. Internal Revenue Service-$7,2240.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$32.6M52%
  2. IT & telecom$29.5M48%

Where the work was performed

  1. Jackson County, MO$25.2M41%
  2. Jefferson County, CO$15M24%
  3. Buncombe County, NC$11.1M18%
  4. Prince William County, VA$4.4M7.1%
  5. Monterey County, CA$3.2M5.2%
  6. Arlington County, VA$2.9M4.7%
  7. Anderson County, TN$223.3K0.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition4.7%
    US 39% · $2.9M
  • Sole-source awards4.7%
    US 30% · $2.9M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. DISC IT SUPPORT SERVICES$94M
    Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Jackson County, MO· Professional services· Sep 23, 2022 – Jul 29, 2026· 12314422F0642
  2. WAPA-WIDE PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT SERVICES$87.4M
    Department of Energy· Jefferson County, CO· IT & telecom· Apr 28, 2021 – Sep 24, 2026· 89503021FWA400413
  3. CLASSIFIED IT SERVICES TASK ORDER 1$82.6M
    Department of the Navy· Arlington County, VA· IT & telecom· Oct 18, 2024 – May 13, 2026· N0001925F0106
  4. OCIO SERVICE DESK SUPPORT$35.9M
    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office· Buncombe County, NC· Professional services· Apr 5, 2021 – Sep 2, 2026· 1333BJ21F00284003
  5. ADVANCED PROBLEM RESOLUTION$26.1M
    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office· Buncombe County, NC· Professional services· Apr 5, 2021 – Sep 2, 2026· 1333BJ21F00284002
  6. NETWORK SYSTEMS OPERABILITY$20.4M
    Department of the Navy· Prince William County, VA· IT & telecom· Mar 15, 2022 – Apr 21, 2026· M0026422F0039
  7. GOODFELLOW COLOCATION, MIGRATION, AND SUPPORT$18.9M
    Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Jackson County, MO· IT & telecom· Feb 18, 2022 – Sep 24, 2026· 12314422F0174
  8. NHEITC SECURITY OPERATIONS CENTER$16.5M
    Department of the Navy· Monterey County, CA· IT & telecom· Aug 1, 2018 – Feb 24, 2026· N0024418F0573

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $7.8M (14 subawards)

9 sub-recipients

  1. KEYLOGIC TECHNOLOGIES CORP$3.6M47%
    OAK RIDGE, TN · 2 subawards
  2. EDGEWATER FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, INC.$1.8M23%
    FREDERICK, MD · 1 subaward
  3. ECCO SELECT CORPORATION$731.4K9.4%
    NORTH KANSAS CITY, MO · 2 subawards
  4. VALTEQ, INC.$573.3K7.3%
    ESTERO, FL · 3 subawards
  5. INGRAM MICRO INC$515.2K6.6%
    IRVINE, CA · 2 subawards
  6. TYGR LLC$233.7K3.0%
    GERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward
  7. APPS INGENUITY LLC$204K2.6%
    HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO · 1 subaward
  8. CDW GOVERNMENT LLC$59.7K0.8%
    VERNON HILLS, IL · 1 subaward
  9. CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP$46.7K0.6%
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 13% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $2M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $4M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $453.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $747.5K received
  • FY2026: $7.8M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

297 companies · $1.5B reported

  1. NOBLIS, INC.$932.9M
    RESTON, VA · 5 subawards · Wired telecommunications carriers
  2. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$83.4M
    RESTON, VA · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. BLACKBERRY CORP$47.4M
    SAN RAMON, CA · 19 subawards · Wired telecommunications carriers

Primes that pay it

33 companies · $243.3M reported

  1. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$68.3M
    GROTON, CT · 27 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MANTECH TSG-2 JOINT VENTURE$57M
    FAIRFAX, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$30.6M
    RESTON, VA · 16 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 28 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC.$367M−60% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more
  2. PRECISE SYSTEMS, INC.$398.1M−18% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$242.1M−58% in FY2026
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION (5 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$40K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$140K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$40K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$40K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$20K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense14 reports
  2. Homeland security14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The Normandy Group, LLC$140K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PACs sponsored

  • AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ASC-PAC)$11.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.