Federal contractor · MCLEAN, VA

AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION

AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION received $220.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 60 awards (−17% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.4B. Its largest customer was Washington Headquarters Services ($79.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$220.5M
New awards
60
Sole-source
7.1%
Single offer
24%
UEI
CFWRL5LXXX93
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

5 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $282.5M in FY2026 together.

  1. AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONMCLEAN, VA · Family page
    $220.5M
  2. EPSILON INCWEAVERVILLE, NC
    $62M
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. EMSOLUTIONS, INC.ARLINGTON, VA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 164.3MFY2017
  2. 237.7MFY2018
  3. 246.1MFY2019
  4. 273.3MFY2020
  5. 227.9MFY2021
  6. 220MFY2022
  7. 287.9MFY2023
  8. 294.6MFY2024
  9. 267MFY2025
  10. 220.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 9 awards
  2. 27 awards
  3. 4 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 11 awards
  6. 2 awards
  7. 2 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$90.1M41%
  2. Research & development$85.3M39%
  3. IT & telecom$44.1M20%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$815K0.4%
  5. Equipment maintenance$244.2K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition31%
    US 39% · $68.2M
  • Sole-source awards7.1%
    US 30% · $15.7M
  • Single-offer competitions24%
    US 8.7% · $52.5M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Contract Management Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Research & development· Mar 11, 2022 – Apr 7, 2026· N6134022C0001
  2. Washington Headquarters Services· District of Columbia, DC· Research & development· Feb 26, 2022 – Jun 2, 2026· HQ003422F0106
  3. Washington Headquarters Services· Alexandria city, VA· Research & development· Feb 11, 2022 – May 29, 2026· HQ003422F0072
  4. U.S. Customs and Border Protection· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· May 6, 2022 – Sep 29, 2026· 70B02C22F00000393
  5. Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Jul 18, 2022 – Jun 5, 2026· N0017422F3002
  6. Washington Headquarters Services· District of Columbia, DC· Research & development· Jun 15, 2021 – May 15, 2026· HQ003421F0243
  7. Washington Headquarters Services· Fairfax County, VA· Research & development· Feb 24, 2022 – May 19, 2026· HQ003422F0091
  8. Defense Health Agency· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Mar 27, 2021 – Feb 11, 2026· HT003821C0006

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $10.9M (19 subawards)

18 sub-recipients

  1. SAN ANTONIO, TX · 1 subaward
  2. FAIRFAX, VA · 1 subaward
  3. RESTON, VA · 2 subawards
  4. BROCKMAN STRATEGY GROUP LLC$470.7K4.3%
    ROUND ROCK, TX · 1 subaward
  5. COLUMBIA, MD · 1 subaward
  6. GREENVILLE, SC · 1 subaward
  7. MCLEAN, VA · 1 subaward
  8. MCG HEALTH, LLC.$184.1K1.7%
    SEATTLE, WA · 1 subaward
  9. AUBURN, NY · 1 subaward
  10. CALIFORNIA, MD · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $242.2K (3 subawards)

3 primes

  1. LAUREL, MD · 1 subaward
  2. SEACORP, LLC$100K41%
    MIDDLETOWN, RI · 1 subaward
  3. STUART, FL · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 5.0% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $1.1B paid out · $15.6M received
  • FY2022: $216.3M paid out · $51M received
  • FY2023: $49.4M paid out · $49.3M received
  • FY2024: $38.7M paid out · $68.7M received
  • FY2025: $13.4M paid out · $51M received
  • FY2026: $10.9M paid out · $242.2K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

297 companies · $1.5B reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 5 subawards · Wired telecommunications carriers
  2. RESTON, VA · 5 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. SAN RAMON, CA · 19 subawards · Wired telecommunications carriers

Primes that pay it

33 companies · $243.3M reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 27 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. FAIRFAX, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. RESTON, VA · 16 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 28 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services+1 more
  2. PRECISE SYSTEMS, INC.$398.1M−18% in FY2026
    LEXINGTON PARK, MD · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$242.1M−58% in FY2026
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION (5 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATIONAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$40K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$140K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$40K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$40K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$20K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense14 reports
  2. Homeland security14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The Normandy Group, LLC$140K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PACs sponsored

  • AMERICAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ASC-PAC)$11.4K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.