Federal contractor · HERNDON, VA

EXOSTAR LLC

EXOSTAR LLC received $2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$2M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
VA34K8JHV226
Parent company
STAMPS.COM INC.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the EVERBRIDGE, INC. company family: 8 registered entities, $5.6M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. EVERBRIDGE, INC.BURLINGTON, MA · Family page
    $3.4M
  2. AUCTANE, INC.AUSTIN, TX
    $237.1K
  3. J.D. POWERMCLEAN, VA
    $0
  4. NC4, LLCPASADENA, CA
    $0
  5. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$2M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jun 9, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· W9128Z26FA027
  2. Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· May 21, 2026 – May 21, 2026· W9128Z26FA014

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $3.7M reported

  1. LEXINGTON, MA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. TYSONS, VA · 6 subawards · Software publishers
  3. LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF$985.4K
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 6 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 72 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ZENLOGIC JV LLC$9.9M−100% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. PDO AHUSAKA JV II, LLC$10.2M−90% in FY2026
    MILWAUKEE, WI · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. APPTRICITY CORPORATION$11M−10% in FY2026
    IRVING, TX · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of EVERBRIDGE, INC. (8 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • AUCTANE, INC.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$640K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$1.9M
$1.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$12.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$400K
    5 reports
  2. 2024$640K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$640K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$240K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Small business25 reports
  2. Trucking and shipping25 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES25 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE25 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Forbes-Tate$800K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$10K80%
  2. Democratic$2,50020%

PACs sponsored

  • AUCTANE, INC. PAC$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.