Federal contractor · BURLINGTON, MA

EVERBRIDGE, INC.

EVERBRIDGE, INC. received $3.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 24 awards (−60% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $57.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$3.4M
New awards
24
Sole-source
2.7%
Single offer
85%
UEI
XCSMWJTSJ7W5
Parent company
STAMPS.COM INC.
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

9 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $5.6M in FY2026 together.

  1. EVERBRIDGE, INC.BURLINGTON, MA · Family page
    $3.4M
  2. EXOSTAR LLCHERNDON, VA
    $2M
  3. AUCTANE, INC.AUSTIN, TX
    $237.1K
  4. J.D. POWERMCLEAN, VA
    $0
  5. NC4, LLCPASADENA, CA
    $0
  6. NIXLE LLCSAN FRANCISCO, CA
    $0
  7. $0
  8. QLIKTECH INCKING OF PRUSSIA, PA
    $0
  9. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.6MFY2017
  2. 4.7MFY2018
  3. 4.6MFY2019
  4. 5.2MFY2020
  5. 6.2MFY2021
  6. 6.1MFY2022
  7. 6.5MFY2023
  8. 8.5MFY2024
  9. 8.5MFY2025
  10. 3.4MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 2 awards
  10. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$3.4M99%
  2. Professional services$22K0.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition87%
    US 39% · $3M
  • Sole-source awards2.7%
    US 30% · $92K
  • Single-offer competitions85%
    US 8.8% · $2.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Middlesex County, MA· IT & telecom· Mar 28, 2025 – Mar 24, 2026· W15QKN25F0187
  2. Social Security Administration· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2025 – Sep 22, 2026· 28321325FDX030227
  3. Office of the Chief Financial Officer· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Sep 22, 2021 – Sep 28, 2026· 12314421F0821
  4. Federal Acquisition Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Aug 20, 2026 – Aug 20, 2026· 47QACB26F0068
  5. Public Buildings Service· Jefferson County, CO· IT & telecom· Nov 25, 2020 – May 1, 2026· 47PJ0021F0028
  6. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency· Middlesex County, MA· IT & telecom· Oct 27, 2023 – Oct 20, 2025· 2031JW24F00018
  7. Department of Housing and Urban Development· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Jun 27, 2025 – Sep 25, 2026· 86614325F00009
  8. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Nov 22, 2024 – Jun 30, 2026· 1333BJ25P00281001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $49.8K (1 subaward)
  • Sub-grants: $218.5K (1 subaward)

2 primes

  1. LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF$218.5K81%
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 1 subaward
  2. LYNCHBURG, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $95.7K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $124.9K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $37.8K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $816K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $268.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $3.7M reported

  1. LEXINGTON, MA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. TYSONS, VA · 6 subawards · Software publishers
  3. LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF$985.4K
    LOS ANGELES, CA · 6 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 72 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ZENLOGIC JV LLC$9.9M−100% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  2. PDO AHUSAKA JV II, LLC$10.2M−90% in FY2026
    MILWAUKEE, WI · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services
  3. APPTRICITY CORPORATION$11M−10% in FY2026
    IRVING, TX · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of EVERBRIDGE, INC. (9 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • AUCTANE, INC.AI match · 100%
  • EverbridgeAI match · 98%
Lobbying · 2025
$640K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2M
$1.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$12.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$440K
    9 reports
  2. 2024$640K
    10 reports
  3. 2025$640K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$240K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Small business25 reports
  2. Trucking and shipping25 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations4 reports
  4. Defense4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES29 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE29 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Forbes-Tate$800K
    14 reports
  2. The Bridge Advisory Group$90K
    6 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$10K80%
  2. Democratic$2,50020%

PACs sponsored

  • AUCTANE, INC. PAC$0 raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.