Federal contractor · CLARKSVILLE, TN

FACILITY SERVICES MANAGEMENT, INC.

FACILITY SERVICES MANAGEMENT, INC. received $78.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 47 awards (−51% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $895M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($76.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$78.6M
New awards
47
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.5%
UEI
EEPCF2DJKJM4
Other than small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $78.6M in FY2026 together.

  1. FACILITY SERVICES MANAGEMENT, INC.CLARKSVILLE, TN · Family page
    $78.6M
  2. FSI CONSTRUCTION, LLCCLARKSVILLE, TN
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 48.6MFY2017
  2. 51.3MFY2018
  3. 67.3MFY2019
  4. 78.3MFY2020
  5. 73.5MFY2021
  6. 71.6MFY2022
  7. 135.3MFY2023
  8. 130.6MFY2024
  9. 160.1MFY2025
  10. 78.6MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$76.8M98%
    44 awards
  2. Federal Acquisition Service$958.5K1.2%
    1 awards
  3. National Archives and Records Administration$862.6K1.1%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$75.7M96%
  2. Facilities & utilities$2M2.5%
  3. Health & medical$958.5K1.2%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Diego County, CA$26M33%
  2. Honolulu County, HI$15.2M19%
  3. Geary County, KS$13.5M17%
  4. Bell County, TX$8.7M11%
  5. Anchorage Municipality, AK$6.2M7.9%
  6. Kitsap County, WA$4.1M5.2%
  7. District of Columbia, DC$2.8M3.6%
  8. Dale County, AL$940.8K1.2%
  9. Montgomery County, AL$723.4K0.9%
  10. Brevard County, FL$688.6K0.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.5%
    US 39% · $374.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.5%
    US 8.8% · $374.3K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. PERFORM O&M WITH REPAIR AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AT NMCSD, CA$65.8M
    Department of the Army· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Aug 4, 2023 – May 5, 2026· W9127823C0016
  2. TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE TASK ORDER AWARD$39.6M
    Department of the Army· Solano County, CA· Construction & real property· Aug 15, 2023 – Feb 17, 2026· W912DY23F0224
  3. PERFORM O&M WITH REPAIR AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AT CDAMC AND SUPPORTING FACILITIES, FORT CAVAZOS, TX$32.3M
    Department of the Army· Bell County, TX· Construction & real property· Dec 8, 2023 – Jun 12, 2026· W9127824C0007
  4. THE INTENT OF THIS PROJECT IS TO REPAINT THE EXTERIOR, REPAIR MECHANICAL ISSUES AND RENOVATE THE STAFF RESTROOMS OF BUILDINGS 559; REPAINT THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS 554 AND 557; AND REPAIR MECHANICAL ISSUES OF BUILDING 1750 AND 1407.$30.5M
    Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Construction & real property· Sep 16, 2025 – Oct 10, 2025· W912DY25FA138
  5. O&M SERVICES FOR A BASE PLUS FOUR OPTION YEARS FOR THE GENERAL LEONARD WOOD ARMY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL LOCATED AT FT. LEONARD WOOD, MO.$24M
    Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· Construction & real property· Jan 29, 2021 – Jun 3, 2026· W912DY21F0079
  6. DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTOR TO RENOVATE THE EXISTING FOURTH AND FIFTH FLOOR SPACES IN BUILDING 6LC TO PROVIDE NEW SPACES FOR THE PAIN MANAGEMENT CLINIC AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE DEPARTMENT, AND TO UPGRADE OVERALL BUILDING INFRASTRUCTURE.$23.3M
    Department of the Army· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2025 – Oct 29, 2025· W9127S25FA116
  7. O&M WITH REPAIR AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION AT MEDDAC MEADE$18M
    Department of the Army· Anne Arundel County, MD· Construction & real property· Dec 28, 2023 – Jun 9, 2026· W9127824C0005
  8. O&M SERVICES: BASE YEAR$17.9M
    Department of the Army· Harrison County, MS· Construction & real property· Jan 27, 2022 – Oct 27, 2025· W912DY22F0071

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $473.5K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $895.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.5M reported

  1. TEYA SUPPORT SERVICES LLC$895.3K
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. ASRC FEDERAL FACILITIES LOGISTICS, LLC$473.5K
    FAIRFIELD, NJ · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
  3. RQ CONSTRUCTION, LLC$154.2K
    CARLSBAD, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KGJJ ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, LLC$339.1M−70% in FY2026
    FORT WORTH, TX · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Facilities support services
  2. CERRIS BUILDERS, INC$275.3M+5,442% in FY2026
    PFLUGERVILLE, TX · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. FEDERAL CONTRACTING INC$285.5M+96% in FY2026
    COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.