Federal contractor · FORT WORTH, TX

KGJJ ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, LLC

KGJJ ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, LLC received $25.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 21 awards (−70% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $412.2M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($21.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$25.9M
New awards
21
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.6%
UEI
HNACGTYK29J7
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 7.7MFY2021
  2. 15.8MFY2022
  3. 49.6MFY2023
  4. 226.5MFY2024
  5. 86.6MFY2025
  6. 25.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 6 awards
  2. 15 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$20.6M80%
  2. Construction & real property$5.3M20%

Where the work was performed

  1. Kings County, CA$547.3K2.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.6%
    US 39% · $163.9K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.6%
    US 8.8% · $163.9K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Richmond County, GA· Facilities & utilities· Jun 30, 2022 – Jun 2, 2026· W9124922C0010
  2. Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Construction & real property· Sep 4, 2024 – Feb 13, 2026· W9127S24F0100
  3. Department of the Army· Escambia County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2024 – Jun 10, 2026· W9127824F0404
  4. Department of the Army· Portsmouth city, VA· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2023 – Feb 19, 2026· W912DY23F0508
  5. Department of the Navy· San Bernardino County, CA· Facilities & utilities· Feb 1, 2024 – Mar 3, 2026· N6247324F4244
  6. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Construction & real property· Aug 16, 2024 – May 22, 2026· N6247324F5052
  7. Department of the Army· Norfolk city, VA· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2024 – Mar 27, 2026· W912DY24F0524
  8. Department of the Army· Tarrant County, TX· Construction & real property· Sep 29, 2023 – Dec 8, 2025· W912DY23F0535

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $757.4K (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. ROSEVILLE, CA · 1 subaward
  2. MCGINNIS CHEN ASSOCIATES INC$158.1K21%
    SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 2.9% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $757.4K reported

  1. ROSEVILLE, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. MCGINNIS CHEN ASSOCIATES INC$158.1K
    SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FACILITY SERVICES MANAGEMENT, INC.$369.6M−51% in FY2026
    CLARKSVILLE, TN · 2 entities · 92% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionArmy · Facilities support services
  2. MESSER CONSTRUCTION CO$238.9M+248% in FY2026
    CINCINNATI, OH · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. PORR GOVERNMENT SERVICES GMBH$266.5M+80% in FY2026
    KAISERSLAUTERN, DEU · 7 entities · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.