Federal contractor · ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD

FAIRWINDS TECHNOLOGIES LLC

FAIRWINDS TECHNOLOGIES LLC received $518.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 206 awards (+1.3% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.6B. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($427.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$518.2M
New awards
206
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
3.6%
UEI
R3G6PWHQRAY5
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.5MFY2017
  2. 947.6KFY2018
  3. 565.5KFY2019
  4. 1.7MFY2020
  5. 54.3MFY2021
  6. 155.8MFY2022
  7. 175.7MFY2023
  8. 163.8MFY2024
  9. 511.5MFY2025
  10. 518.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 172 awards
  2. 6 awards
  3. 9 awards
  4. 7 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 4 awards
  7. 2 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 2 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$254.8M49%
  2. IT & telecom$193.2M37%
  3. Professional services$49.6M9.6%
  4. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$20.6M4.0%
  5. Research & development$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition3.6%
    US 39% · $18.6M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions3.6%
    US 8.8% · $18.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Middlesex County, MA· IT & telecom· Oct 10, 2025 – Apr 13, 2026· SPRMM126FTE00
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Harford County, MD· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 28, 2025 – Mar 3, 2026· SPRMM125FTQ0V
  3. Department of the Navy· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Mar 2, 2026 – Mar 2, 2026· N0042126F0182
  4. Department of the Army· Harford County, MD· Professional services· Dec 16, 2024 – May 21, 2026· W15P7T25F0022
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Harford County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· May 20, 2025 – Mar 3, 2026· SPRMM125FTQ0U
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Harford County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 12, 2025 – Apr 22, 2026· SPRMM125FE615
  7. Defense Information Systems Agency· Harford County, MD· IT & telecom· Apr 3, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· HC108426F0207
  8. Defense Logistics Agency· Harford County, MD· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 12, 2025 – May 19, 2026· SPRMM125FE613

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $38M (46 subawards)

36 sub-recipients

  1. AIRSHIP AI, INC.$5.6M15%
    REDMOND, WA · 3 subawards
  2. FORT COLLINS, CO · 5 subawards
  3. OPA LOCKA, FL · 1 subaward
  4. NAMPA, ID · 1 subaward
  5. GOLETA, CA · 1 subaward
  6. TRENTON, NJ · 1 subaward
  7. LOS ANGELES, CA · 1 subaward
  8. EXETER, NH · 1 subaward
  9. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 1 subaward
  10. MODESTO, CA · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $118.6K (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward
  2. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 7.3% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $361.9K paid out · $26.3M received
  • FY2022: $72M paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2023: $104.7M paid out · $506K received
  • FY2024: $97.6M paid out · $7M received
  • FY2025: $79.9M paid out · $322K received
  • FY2026: $38M paid out · $118.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

100 companies · $392.5M reported

  1. CLARKSBURG, MD · 16 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. NEWTOWN, PA · 22 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. PLANO, TX · 7 subawards · Computer systems design and related services

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $35.6M reported

  1. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA · 7 subawards · Machinery, equipment, and supplies merchant wholesalers
  2. GROTON, CT · 3 subawards · Communications equipment manufacturing
  3. PASCAGOULA, MS · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 37 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. STS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED$200.6M−49% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 16% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing
  2. AUGUST SCHELL ENTERPRISES, INC.$339.2M−20% in FY2026
    ROCKVILLE, MD · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesNavy · Computer systems design and related servicesAir Force · Computer systems design and related services+1 more
  3. MELBOURNE, FL · 60 entities · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingArmy · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Fairwinds TechnologiesAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$120K
10 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$470K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    6 reports
  2. 2024$210K
    13 reports
  3. 2025$120K
    10 reports
  4. 2026$100K
    5 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense26 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. SENATE33 reports
  2. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES24 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. THE LIVINGSTON GROUP, L.L.C.$260K
    8 reports
  2. OCULUS STRATEGIES, LLC$110K
    7 reports
  3. Brian Glackin & Associates LLC$100K
    2 reports
  4. JMH Group, formerly Jamian Mcelroy & Hamlin, LLC$0
    15 reports
  5. Jones Walker, LLP$0
    2 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.