Federal contractor · MELBOURNE, FL

DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLC

DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLC received $161.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 214 awards (−77% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.3B. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($84.4M).

Obligations · FY2026
$161.2M
New awards
214
Sole-source
67%
Single offer
15%
UEI
MC27B7LGBL34
Parent company
LEONARDO S.P.A.
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

60 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $443.9M in FY2026 together.

  1. DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLCMELBOURNE, FL · Family page
    $161.2M
  2. $70.3M
  3. RADA TECHNOLOGIES LLCGERMANTOWN, MD
    $56.4M
  4. LEONARDO UK LTDLUTON, GBR
    $48.4M
  5. DRS SYSTEMS, INCMELBOURNE, FL
    $45.1M
  6. DRS ADVANCED ISR LLCBEAVERCREEK, OH
    $37.4M
  7. $15.1M
  8. $12.4M
  9. DRS NAVAL POWER SYSTEMS INCMENOMONEE FALLS, WI
    $11.5M
  10. PIVOTAL POWER INCBEDFORD, CAN
    $6M
  11. $5.1M
  12. $3.4M
  13. $2.8M
  14. $1.8M
  15. $1.3M
  16. $338.8K
  17. $303.8K
  18. DRS ADVANCED ISR, LLCFORT WALTON BEACH, FL
    $149.2K
  19. $134.1K
  20. LEONARDO UK LTDBASILDON, GBR
    $31.9K
Show all 60 members
  1. $28K
  2. $25.5K
  3. $8,629
  4. $500
  5. $0
  6. $0
  7. $0
  8. $0
  9. $0
  10. $0
  11. $0
  12. $0
  13. $0
  14. $0
  15. $0
  16. $0
  17. $0
  18. $0
  19. $0
  20. $0
  21. $0
  22. $0
  23. DRS SIGNAL SOLUTIONS, INCANNAPOLIS JUNCTION, MD
    $0
  24. DRS SONETICOM, INC.MELBOURNE, FL
    $0
  25. $0
  26. $0
  27. DRS TECHNOLOGIES CANADA LTDCARLETON PLACE, CAN
    $0
  28. $0
  29. $0
  30. LASERTEL INC.TUCSON, AZ
    $0
  31. $0
  32. $0
  33. LEONARDO MW LTDBASILDON, GBR
    $0
  34. LEONARDO S.P.A.POMEZIA, ITA
    $0
  35. LEONARDO UK LTDEDINBURGH, GBR
    $0
  36. LEONARDO UK LTDSOUTHAMPTON, GBR
    $0
  37. $0
  38. $0
  39. -$59.5K
  40. -$35.3M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 439.9MFY2017
  2. 564.3MFY2018
  3. 663.3MFY2019
  4. 595.6MFY2020
  5. 388.6MFY2021
  6. 429.5MFY2022
  7. 668.2MFY2023
  8. 647.1MFY2024
  9. 703.5MFY2025
  10. 161.2MFY2026
  11. 0FY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 113 awards
  2. 59 awards
  3. 6 awards
  4. 12 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 4 awards
  10. 15 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$97M60%
  2. Professional services$23.2M14%
  3. Other equipment & supplies$20M12%
  4. IT & telecom$15.1M9.4%
  5. Research & development$2.8M1.7%
  6. Equipment maintenance$2.5M1.6%
  7. Education & social services$638.5K0.4%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$638.5K0.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition82%
    US 39% · $132.5M
  • Sole-source awards67%
    US 30% · $108.8M
  • Single-offer competitions15%
    US 8.7% · $23.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 18 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 9 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 3 awards
  4. Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. Defense Contract Management Agency· Brevard County, FL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jan 23, 2026 – Jan 23, 2026· W15P7T04CA205
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Brevard County, FL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 21, 2023 – May 6, 2026· SPRRA223F0083
  3. Department of the Army· Brevard County, FL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jun 27, 2024 – May 18, 2026· W91CRB24F0253
  4. Defense Information Systems Agency· Harford County, MD· IT & telecom· Dec 20, 2023 – Mar 23, 2026· HC108424F0067
  5. Department of the Army· Brevard County, FL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Jul 8, 2025 – May 18, 2026· W91CRB25FA046
  6. Department of the Army· Brevard County, FL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Sep 17, 2025 – May 18, 2026· W91CRB25FA250
  7. Department of the Army· Brevard County, FL· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 23, 2022 – Jun 12, 2026· W909MY22C0023
  8. Department of the Army· Brevard County, FL· Professional services· Oct 19, 2016 – Mar 25, 2026· W56HZV12C0199

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$14.6M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 8.3MFY2021
  2. 5MFY2022
  3. 1.3MFY2023
  4. -0.1FY2024
  5. 0FY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $99.3M (384 subawards)

117 sub-recipients

  1. MACK TECHNOLOGIES FLORIDA, INC.$13.2M13%
    MELBOURNE, FL · 43 subawards
  2. NILES, IL · 20 subawards
  3. FK INSTRUMENT CO LLC$5.7M5.7%
    CLEARWATER, FL · 14 subawards
  4. VERIGON LLC$5.1M5.1%
    TEMPE, AZ · 15 subawards
  5. FIBREFORM ELECTRONICS, LLC$5M5.0%
    HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA · 3 subawards
  6. GALENA, KS · 11 subawards
  7. DLA STRATEGIC MATERIALS$3.6M3.6%
    FORT BELVOIR, VA · 5 subawards
  8. CULLMAN, AL · 2 subawards
  9. MOOG INC.$2.9M3.0%
    BLACKSBURG, VA · 12 subawards
  10. SAINT PETERSBURG, FL · 3 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $15.1M (13 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $1.2M (1 subaward)

10 primes

  1. FORT WAYNE, IN · 1 subaward
  2. STERLING HEIGHTS, MI · 2 subawards
  3. ANDOVER, MA · 1 subaward
  4. ANN ARBOR, MI · 1 subaward
  5. STERLING HEIGHTS, MI · 2 subawards
  6. YORK, PA · 2 subawards
  7. SUPPLYCORE LLC$251.3K1.5%
    ROCKFORD, IL · 1 subaward
  8. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward
  9. STERLING HEIGHTS, MI · 2 subawards
  10. LARGO, FL · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 62% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $135.1M paid out · $76.6M received
  • FY2022: $110M paid out · $48.8M received
  • FY2023: $86.6M paid out · $160.2M received
  • FY2024: $177.1M paid out · $219.1M received
  • FY2025: $131.5M paid out · $233.5M received
  • FY2026: $99.3M paid out · $16.3M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

824 companies · $1.8B reported

  1. BURNSVILLE, MN · 165 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. MOOG INC$89.8M
    EAST AURORA, NY · 101 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. MACK TECHNOLOGIES FLORIDA, INC.$60.9M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 146 subawards · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing

Primes that pay it

71 companies · $6.7B reported

  1. FORT WORTH, TX · 1,165 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  2. GROTON, CT · 284 subawards · Other transportation equipment manufacturing
  3. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 324 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 113 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. UNDERSEA SENSOR SYSTEMS, INC.$640.9M−38% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA CITY, IN · 18% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. KONGSBERG, NOR · 20% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Other fabricated metal product manufacturingNavy · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. FAIRWINDS TECHNOLOGIES LLC$1.2B+1.3% in FY2026
    ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingArmy · Communications equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of DRS NETWORK & IMAGING SYSTEMS LLC (60 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Leonardo S.P.A.AI match · 100%
  • Leonardo US Cyber and Security Solutions LLC. (Formerly SELEX ES INC.)AI match · 100%
  • Leonardo Electronics US Inc.AI match · 97%
  • RADA Technologies LLCAI match · 94%
Lobbying · 2025
$230K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$760K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$180K
    7 reports
  2. 2024$60K
    3 reports
  3. 2025$230K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$290K
    6 reports

Top issues

  1. Homeland security15 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations13 reports
  3. Defense12 reports
  4. Law enforcement, crime and criminal justice9 reports
  5. Transportation9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES22 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE16 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. American Defense International, Inc.$200K
    6 reports
  2. BALLARD PARTNERS$200K
    2 reports
  3. THE PRENDA GROUP LLC$180K
    9 reports
  4. Capitoline Consulting, LLC$160K
    4 reports
  5. PRASAM$20K
    3 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.