Federal contractor · MORGANTOWN, WV

FCX SYSTEMS INC

FCX SYSTEMS INC received $55.4K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−78% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $11.5M. Its largest customer was U.S. Coast Guard ($45.8K).

Obligations · FY2026
$55.4K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
93%
UEI
ZU51LS7JZ8L5
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.9MFY2017
  2. 729.8KFY2018
  3. 2.7MFY2019
  4. 593.1KFY2020
  5. 814.4KFY2021
  6. 731.6KFY2022
  7. 463.5KFY2023
  8. 277.6KFY2024
  9. 255.9KFY2025
  10. 55.4KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$50.3K77%
  2. Professional services$15.2K23%

Where the work was performed

  1. 66$9,67517%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition92%
    US 39% · $51.3K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · -$369
  • Single-offer competitions93%
    US 8.8% · $51.6K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · -$10K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Coast Guard· Charleston County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Nov 25, 2025 – Nov 25, 2025· 70Z08526PLREP0015
  2. U.S. Coast Guard· Pinellas County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Mar 19, 2026 – Mar 19, 2026· 70Z02826PMIAM0026
  3. U.S. Coast Guard· Monroe County, FL· Professional services· Nov 20, 2025 – Nov 20, 2025· 70Z08026PMECP0008
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Miami-Dade County, FL· Construction & real property· Aug 22, 2025 – Apr 15, 2026· 70Z02825PMIAM0086
  5. Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· Jun 8, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· FA524026P0012
  6. U.S. Coast Guard· Baltimore city, MD· Equipment maintenance· Apr 28, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· 70Z04026P60413Y00

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $339K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $625.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $313.7K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $215.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

9 companies · $4.1M reported

  1. PASCAGOULA, MS · 5 subawards · Ship and boat building
  2. GREENVILLE, TX · 3 subawards · Aerospace product and parts manufacturing
  3. YORK, PA · 1 subaward · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 11 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MILPOWER SOURCE, INC.$337.6K+19% in FY2026
    BELMONT, NH · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturingNavy · Electrical equipment manufacturing
  2. NEXT SILICON INC$185K−100% in FY2026
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing
  3. VISTA, CA · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Computer and peripheral equipment manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.