Federal contractor · ARLINGTON, VA

FEDERATED WIRELESS INC

FEDERATED WIRELESS INC received $2.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards. Since FY2017: $7.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($2.3M). It also received $200K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$2.8M
New awards
2
Sole-source
80%
Single offer
20%
UEI
GB68YPMZEMA1
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 701KFY2017
  2. 224.8KFY2018
  3. 117.2KFY2019
  4. 3.9MFY2024
  5. -139.5KFY2025
  6. 2.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$2.3M80%
  2. Research & development$550K20%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $2.8M
  • Sole-source awards80%
    US 30% · $2.3M
  • Single-offer competitions20%
    US 8.8% · $550K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Dougherty County, GA· IT & telecom· Sep 26, 2024 – May 19, 2026· M6700424P4008
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Arlington County, VA· Research & development· Jan 28, 2026 – Jan 28, 2026· SP470126C0026

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

FEDERATED WIRELESS INC received $200K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (1 new awards). Its largest program was 47.084 · Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships ($200K).

Assistance · FY2026
$200K
New awards
1
Actions
1

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 200KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$200K100%

Top programs

  1. 47.084 · Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships$200K100%

Awarding agencies

Largest awards

  1. 47.084 · Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Sep 11, 2026 – Sep 11, 2026· 2554531

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $50K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. DENVER, CO · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $50K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $2.2M reported

  1. BOULDER, CO · 3 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INFOMARINES INC.$7.4M+141% in FY2026
    ALDIE, VA · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Data processing, hosting, and related services
  3. FORT MONROE, VA · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Space research and technology

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Federated Wireless, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2023
$120K
6 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2025
$180K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    6 reports
  2. 2024$0
    1 reports
  3. 2025$60K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Telecommunications4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES4 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The Madison Group$180K
    4 reports
  2. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD$0
    5 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.