Federal contractor · BOULDER, CO

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO received $67.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 60 awards (+33% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $536M. Its largest customer was National Aeronautics and Space Administration ($62M). It also received $363.7M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$67.1M
New awards
60
Sole-source
39%
Single offer
1.5%
UEI
SPVKK1RC2MZ3
Other than small businessEducational institutionGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

7 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $72.7M in FY2026 together.

  1. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOBOULDER, CO · Family page
    $67.1M
  2. $3.6M
  3. $2M
  4. $0
  5. $0
  6. $0
  7. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 44MFY2017
  2. 37MFY2018
  3. 46.8MFY2019
  4. 58.9MFY2020
  5. 68.1MFY2021
  6. 62.6MFY2022
  7. 49.5MFY2023
  8. 51.4MFY2024
  9. 50.6MFY2025
  10. 67.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 35 awards
  2. 6 awards
  3. 4 awards
  4. 7 awards
  5. 1 awards
  6. 2 awards
  7. 1 awards
  8. 1 awards
  9. 1 awards
  10. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$55.7M83%
  2. Professional services$10.5M16%
  3. IT & telecom$686K1.0%
  4. Other equipment & supplies$89.7K0.1%
  5. Equipment maintenance$64.2K0.1%
  6. Facilities & utilities$47.5K0.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition41%
    US 39% · $27.4M
  • Sole-source awards39%
    US 30% · $26.4M
  • Single-offer competitions1.5%
    US 8.7% · $1M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 2 awards
  2. Department of Commerce · 3 awards
  3. Department of the Interior · 5 awards
  4. Department of Commerce · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. NASA HEADQUARTERS (HQ) MANAGES THE MARS EXPLORATION PROGRAM (MEP), WHICH SELECTED THE MARS ATMOSPHERE AND VOLATILE EVOLUTION (MAVEN) PROJECT AS A MARS SCOUT MISSION. THE MAVEN PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) IS DR. BRUCE JAKOSKY, OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO, LABORATORY FOR ATMOSPHERIC AND SPACE PHYSICS (LASP) IN BOULDER, CO. THE PI WILL HAVE OVERALL CONTROL OF THE MAVEN PROJECT. HE WILL PROVIDE SCIENCE LEADERSHIP FOR THE MAVEN MISSION AND MANAGE EDUCATION AND PUBLIC OUTREACH. THIS EFFORT APPLIES TO LASP AND COVERS PHASES A, B, C, D, AND E OF THE MAVEN MISSION. UNDER PHASE A OF THIS CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT, PROVIDING TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORTS, AND MISSION REVIEWS. UNDER PHASE B, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPORTING REQUIREMENTS ANALYSIS, PROJECT PLANS, PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEWS, MONTHLY STATUS REVIEWS, QUARTERLY TEAM MEETINGS, E/PO ACTIVITIES, AND THE PRELIMINARY SCIENCE DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN. UNDER PHASES C AND D, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPPORTING MONTHLY STATUS REVIEWS, QUARTERLY TEAM REVIEWS, RESPONDING TO ACTION ITEMS THAT RESULT FROM MEETINGS/REVIEWS, SUPPORTING FORMAL REVIEWS AND LAUNCH SITE ACTIVITIES, AND MANAGEMENT OF E/PO ACTIVITIES. UNDER PHASE E, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING OVERALL MANAGEMENT OF THE MAVEN SCIENCE PROGRAM AND DATA ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES, ENSURING DELIVERY OF MAVEN SCIENCE DATA PRODUCTS, MISSION DOCUMENTATION, AND ANALYTICAL SOFTWARE TOOLS INTO PDS, PARTICIPATING IN ANALYSIS AND RESOLUTION OF SPACECRAFT ANOMALIES, AS NECESSARY, PROVIDING OVERALL MANAGEMENT OF E/PO ACTIVITIES PER E/PO PLAN, PRESENTING SCIENTIFIC RESULTS AT NATIONAL CONFERENCES AND IN SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE, AND PROVIDING CONTRACT CLOSEOUT SUPPORT.$118.6M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Boulder County, CO· Professional services· Oct 26, 2016 – Sep 4, 2026· NNH10CC04C
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Boulder County, CO· Research & development· Dec 6, 2016 – Jul 22, 2026· NNG07HW00C
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Boulder County, CO· Research & development· Oct 26, 2016 – Jul 31, 2026· GSFC0200210DNAS502140
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Boulder County, CO· Research & development· Mar 27, 2023 – Aug 28, 2026· 80GSFC23CA035
  5. GLOBAL-SCALE OBSERVATIONS OF THE LIMB AND DISK (GOLD) MISSION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE PERSONNEL, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND FACILITIES NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE GOLD MISSION AS DESCRIBED IN THE GOLD CONCEPT STUDY REPORT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE REPORTS, REVIEWS, AND DOCUMENTATION FOR ALL ASPECTS OF THE PROGRAM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MANAGE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SCIENCE TEAM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE GOLD SCIENCE DATA CENTER (SDC) AT UCF, AND SHALL PERFORM DATA REDUCTION AND ANALYSIS FOR THREE YEARS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF COMMISSIONING THE GOLD INSTRUMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESENT THE SCIENTIFIC RESULTS IN PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLISHED PAPERS, AND PROVIDE RAW DATA AND DATA PRODUCTS FOR ARCHIVING TO AN APPROVED DATA ARCHIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALGORITHM DEVELOPMENT AND SCIENCE PLANNING AND ANALYSIS OF MISSION DATA AND THE PUBLICATION OF RESULTS. THE GOLD PROJECT SHALL FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES OF A MISSION OF OPPORTUNITY AND THE GOLD CONTRACT. THE GOLD PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR (PI) SHALL HAVE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. THE PI SHALL DELEGATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT TASKS TO THE PROJECT MANAGER (PM) AS APPROPRIATE. THE PM SHALL DIRECT THE GOLD PROJECT AND HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR OVERALL TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OF THE CONTRACT AND ALL SUBCONTRACTS. THE PI/PM SHALL BE THE FOCAL POINT FOR ALL CONTACT WITH THE GOVERNMENT. THE PM AND STAFF SHALL SUPPORT THE PI AS REQUIRED INCLUDING THE SCHEDULING AND COORDINATING OF MEETINGS AND REVIEWS, SCHEDULE CONTROL AND REPORTING, FINANCIAL CONTROL AND REPORTING, SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT AND DOCUMENTATION, PROGRESS REPORTS AND REVIEWS AS WELL AS ALL ANOMALY REPORTING ACTIVITIES.$39.8M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Boulder County, CO· Research & development· Mar 1, 2018 – Sep 24, 2026· 80GSFC18C0061
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Boulder County, CO· Research & development· Aug 6, 2019 – Sep 29, 2026· 80GSFC19C0069
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Boulder County, CO· Research & development· Jun 30, 2026 – Sep 2, 2026· 80MSFC26C0014
  8. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Boulder County, CO· Research & development· Jun 20, 2023 – Sep 10, 2026· 80GSFC23CA062

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO received $363.7M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1,580 actions (262 new awards), −11% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 11.432 · National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Cooperative Institutes ($59.6M).

Assistance · FY2026
$363.7M
New awards
262
Actions
1,580
Since FY2021
$2.5B

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 422.3MFY2021
  2. 398.1MFY2022
  3. 414.2MFY2023
  4. 445.6MFY2024
  5. 408.4MFY2025
  6. 363.7MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$317M87%
  2. Direct payments$45.4M12%
  3. Other assistance$1.3M0.4%

Top programs

  1. 11.432 · National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Cooperative Institutes$59.6M16%
  2. 43.001 · Science$39.8M11%
  3. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$35.8M9.9%
  4. 93.859 · Biomedical Research and Research Training$18.6M5.1%
  5. 47.049 · Mathematical and Physical Sciences$16.3M4.5%
  6. 11.620 · Science, Technology, Business and/or Education Outreach$15.9M4.4%
  7. 47.076 · Stem Education (Formerly Education and Human Resources)$11.4M3.1%
  8. 47.074 · Biological Sciences$10.5M2.9%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services
  2. Department of Commerce
  3. Department of Commerce
  4. Department of Defense

Largest awards

  1. 11.432 · National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Cooperative Institutes· National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Cooperative agreement· Jun 29, 2022 – Sep 24, 2026· NA22OAR4320151
  2. 11.620 · Science, Technology, Business and/or Education Outreach· National Institute of Standards and Technology· Cooperative agreement· Apr 7, 2023 – Aug 31, 2026· 70NANB23H027
  3. 47.049 · Mathematical and Physical Sciences· National Science Foundation· Cooperative agreement· Mar 26, 2021 – Jul 31, 2026· 1548924
  4. 11.609 · Measurement and Engineering Research and Standards· National Institute of Standards and Technology· Cooperative agreement· Dec 22, 2021 – Jul 10, 2026· 70NANB22H001
  5. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 19, 2024 – Nov 11, 2025· P063P240062
  6. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 14, 2025 – Sep 10, 2026· P063P250062

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $48.5M (23 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $26.8M (173 subawards)

96 sub-recipients

  1. BERKELEY, CA · 11 subawards
  2. ANN ARBOR, MI · 7 subawards
  3. LOGAN, UT · 1 subaward
  4. ARVADA, CO · 1 subaward
  5. TUCSON, AZ · 4 subawards
  6. IOWA CITY, IA · 4 subawards
  7. AURORA, CO · 18 subawards
  8. IRVINE, CA · 2 subawards
  9. BOULDER, CO · 1 subaward
  10. LOS ANGELES, CA · 4 subawards

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $5.8M (14 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $17M (96 subawards)

67 primes

  1. PRINCETON, NJ · 1 subaward
  2. NEW YORK, NY · 3 subawards
  3. BOULDER, CO · 3 subawards
  4. LINCOLN, NE · 1 subaward
  5. CHESTNUT HILL, MA · 2 subawards
  6. SEATTLE, WA · 2 subawards
  7. GAINESVILLE, FL · 1 subaward
  8. FORT COLLINS, CO · 7 subawards
  9. STANFORD, CA · 5 subawards
  10. EVANSTON, IL · 4 subawards

Its reported sub-contracts equal 72% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $53.2M paid out · $49M received
  • FY2022: $42.6M paid out · $63.8M received
  • FY2023: $43.5M paid out · $48.6M received
  • FY2024: $46.9M paid out · $66.3M received
  • FY2025: $88.6M paid out · $39.4M received
  • FY2026: $75.3M paid out · $22.9M received
  • FY2027: $0 paid out · $33.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

532 companies · $600M reported

  1. OAKLAND, CA · 81 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. FORT WORTH, TX · 23 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. YORK, PA · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

313 companies · $893.5M reported

  1. NEW YORK, NY · 5 subawards
  2. YORK, PA · 6 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. DENVER, CO · 74 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 43 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EL SEGUNDO, CA · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. BARRIOS TECHNOLOGY, LLC$153.7M−79% in FY2026
    HOUSTON, TX · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. MITCHELL VANTAGE SYSTEMS LLC$158.8M−42% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO (7 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • The Regents of the University of ColoradoAI match · 100%
  • The Regents of the University of Colorado obo University of Colorado AnschutzAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$240K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$840K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$240K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$240K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$240K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$120K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  2. Science and technology14 reports
  3. Defense10 reports
  4. Education5 reports
  5. Disaster planning and emergencies2 reports
  6. Economics and economic development1 reports
  7. Health issues1 reports
  8. Homeland security1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Lewis-Burke Associates, LLC$840K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.