Federal contractor · OGDEN, UT

FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE CORP

FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE CORP received $348.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (−13% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($232.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$348.2K
New awards
9
Sole-source
10%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
MPVYFLBR7C74
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 220.6KFY2017
  2. 185.1KFY2018
  3. 186KFY2019
  4. 208.8KFY2020
  5. 160.7KFY2021
  6. 461.4KFY2022
  7. 461.7KFY2023
  8. 381.5KFY2024
  9. 399KFY2025
  10. 348.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 5 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$292.7K84%
  2. Facilities & utilities$55.5K16%

Where the work was performed

  1. Pima County, AZ$232.9K67%
  2. Cobb County, GA$30.5K8.7%
  3. 78$5,0401.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition10%
    US 39% · $35.5K
  • Sole-source awards10%
    US 30% · $35.5K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Pima County, AZ· Professional services· Mar 3, 2022 – Oct 1, 2025· 36C26222C0077
  2. National Park Service· Washington County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Mar 31, 2021 – Nov 19, 2025· 140P1221P0038
  3. Department of the Army· Cobb County, GA· Professional services· May 6, 2024 – May 4, 2026· W912JM24P0012
  4. Department of the Army· Wake County, NC· Facilities & utilities· Dec 30, 2024 – Dec 19, 2025· W9124225PA001
  5. Department of the Army· Weber County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Dec 8, 2022 – Dec 19, 2025· W901UZ23P0003
  6. Department of the Army· Weber County, UT· Professional services· Jan 6, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· W912KZ25PA002
  7. Department of the Army· Facilities & utilities· Mar 5, 2025 – Jan 26, 2026· W9127P25CA001
  8. Public Buildings Service· Orleans Parish, LA· Construction & real property· Dec 18, 2024 – Feb 26, 2026· 47PH0525P0004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $2.2M (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. RIVERSIDE, CA · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $2.2M reported

  1. RIVERSIDE, CA · 1 subaward · Building equipment contractors

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. RIVERFRONT SAFETY & HEALTH, LC$674.1K+72% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. HAYDUK ENGINEERING, LLC$684.6K−100% in FY2026
    RONKONKOMA, NY · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.