Federal contractor · BUFFALO, NY

FLEXIBLE LIFELINE SYSTEMS INC.

FLEXIBLE LIFELINE SYSTEMS INC. received $14.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−49% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $953.1K. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($10.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.5K
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JL61T3BZLCA5
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 3.1KFY2017
  2. 290.5KFY2018
  3. 7.8KFY2019
  4. 46.8KFY2020
  5. 22KFY2021
  6. 335.4KFY2022
  7. 103KFY2023
  8. 101.3KFY2024
  9. 28.7KFY2025
  10. 14.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$10.1K70%
  2. Construction & real property$4,41030%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $14.5K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $14.5K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs· Boone County, MO· Equipment maintenance· Sep 29, 2026 – Sep 29, 2026· 36C25526P0364
  2. Department of the Navy· San Diego County, CA· Professional services· Aug 19, 2025 – Apr 16, 2026· N0060425P4092
  3. Department of the Navy· Erie County, NY· Construction & real property· May 21, 2025 – May 21, 2026· N6133125P0125

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $182.6K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $365.1K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $33.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $581.3K reported

  1. WATSONVILLE, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 7 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LUGO, ITA · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing
  2. OCOEE, FL · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing
  3. LADYVILLE, BLZ · 41% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Agriculture, construction, and mining machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 21 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.