Federal contractor · MINNEAPOLIS, MN

M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY

M. A. MORTENSON COMPANY received $851.1M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 17 awards (+5,400% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.1B. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($613.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$851.1M
New awards
17
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
GPXRWUEUHZ19
Parent company
M. A. MORTENSON COMPANIES, INC.
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 327.4MFY2017
  2. 116.6MFY2018
  3. 94.2MFY2019
  4. 101.8MFY2020
  5. 73.1MFY2021
  6. 144.4MFY2022
  7. 191MFY2023
  8. 163.1MFY2024
  9. 15.5MFY2025
  10. 851.1MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 8 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 3 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$851.1M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Davis County, UT$550.1K0.1%
  2. Sarpy County, NE$393.2K0.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications72%
    US 5.1% · $610M

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Hidalgo County, TX· Construction & real property· Mar 6, 2026 – Mar 6, 2026· W9126G26CA011
  2. National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Construction & real property· Sep 22, 2026 – Sep 22, 2026· 75N99026F00002
  3. Department of the Navy· Camden County, GA· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2018 – Oct 14, 2025· N6945018C0905
  4. Agricultural Research Service· Clarke County, GA· Construction & real property· Jul 31, 2017 – Dec 5, 2025· AG3K25C170001
  5. Department of the Army· Davis County, UT· Construction & real property· Jun 28, 2022 – May 29, 2026· W9123822C0006
  6. Department of the Army· Davis County, UT· Construction & real property· Jul 14, 2023 – May 6, 2026· W9123823C0023
  7. Department of the Army· Sarpy County, NE· Construction & real property· Jun 30, 2022 – Jun 11, 2026· W9128F22C0027
  8. Department of the Army· Albemarle County, VA· Construction & real property· Apr 30, 2021 – Jun 5, 2026· W9123621C2024

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $27.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $30M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $91.8M paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

80 companies · $149.3M reported

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 2 subawards · Nonresidential building construction
  2. FAIRFIELD, NJ · 1 subaward · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. TOOELE, UT · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CONTI FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC$779.1M−6.1% in FY2026
    ORLANDO, FL · 70% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. KORTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY$554.3M−26% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 51% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. ACC CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.$353M−78% in FY2026
    AUGUSTA, GA · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.