Federal contractor · CHATSWORTH, CA

FLYHT INC.

FLYHT INC. received $1.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+32% vs FY2025). Since FY2023: $4.4M. Its largest customer was National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ($1.8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.9M
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
FFUVGML68156
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 500KFY2023
  2. 465.4KFY2024
  3. 1.5MFY2025
  4. 1.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$1.8M93%
  2. IT & telecom$137.7K7.1%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$1.8M93%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.9M
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $1.9M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 22, 2025 – Sep 2, 2026· 1305M225P0238
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Denver County, CO· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· Aug 31, 2023 – Mar 4, 2026· 1305M223PNWWG0307
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Los Angeles County, CA· IT & telecom· Jun 9, 2026 – Jun 9, 2026· 80NSSC26P0764

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NORTEKUSA, INC$5.2M−39% in FY2026
    BOSTON, MA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. BOULDER, CO · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. MRV SYSTEMS, LLC$7.1M+70% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • FLYHT, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$120K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$420K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$120K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$120K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$60K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations14 reports
  2. Science and technology8 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES13 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE12 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES, LLC$420K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.