Federal contractor · LIVERMORE, CA

FORMFACTOR, INC.

FORMFACTOR, INC. received $16.2K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−89% vs FY2025). Since FY2020: $2.3M. Its largest customer was Defense Microelectronics Activity ($16.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$16.2K
New awards
3
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
RS88D3S15F37
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the HIGH PRECISION DEVICES, INC company family: 3 registered entities, $16.2K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. HIGH PRECISION DEVICES, INCBOULDER, CO · Family page
    $0
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 8.5KFY2020
  2. 25KFY2021
  3. 267.3KFY2022
  4. 777.5KFY2023
  5. 1.1MFY2024
  6. 152.2KFY2025
  7. 16.2KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$16.2K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $16.2K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $16.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 20, 2024 – Aug 19, 2026· 1333ND24PNB030638
  2. SRVT2S$240.7K
    Defense Microelectronics Activity· Sacramento County, CA· Equipment maintenance· Apr 18, 2022 – May 26, 2026· HQ072722P0008
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Alameda County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Jul 22, 2025 – Dec 1, 2025· 80NSSC25PB455

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $304.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $108.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $67.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $808.3K reported

  1. NEW YORK, NY · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. ROY, UT · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institute of Standards and Technology · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNational Institute of Standards and Technology · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. EVOLV TECHNOLOGIES INC$1.3M+679% in FY2026
    WALTHAM, MA · 25% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Scientific research and development servicesSmithsonian Institution · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. MPI AMERICA INC.$1.1M−53% in FY2026
    SAN JOSE, CA · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institute of Standards and Technology · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturingNational Institute of Standards and Technology · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingArmy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.