Federal contractor · HUNTSVILLE, AL

FORTIS INDUSTRIES LLC

FORTIS INDUSTRIES LLC received $8.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 47 awards (−16% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $192.7M. Its largest customer was Public Buildings Service ($5.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$8.7M
New awards
47
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
K5LMQHTJMVY7
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 26.3MFY2017
  2. 30.7MFY2018
  3. 32.4MFY2019
  4. 28.1MFY2020
  5. 17.1MFY2021
  6. 15.8MFY2022
  7. 12.3MFY2023
  8. 10.9MFY2024
  9. 10.4MFY2025
  10. 8.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 29 awards
  2. 7 awards
  3. 1 awards
  4. 2 awards
  5. 8 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$8.6M98%
  2. Construction & real property$175.6K2.0%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Professional services· Nov 15, 2016 – Mar 13, 2026· 0001
  2. Public Buildings Service· Tarrant County, TX· Facilities & utilities· Apr 29, 2025 – Aug 26, 2026· 47PH0225F0216
  3. Public Buildings Service· Tarrant County, TX· Facilities & utilities· May 1, 2024 – Feb 27, 2026· 47PH0224F0201
  4. Department of the Navy· York County, ME· Facilities & utilities· Feb 26, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· N4008526F0443
  5. Department of the Army· Madison County, AL· Facilities & utilities· Nov 7, 2023 – Dec 10, 2025· W9127S24F7000
  6. Department of the Army· Pulaski County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Nov 25, 2022 – Dec 30, 2025· W9127S23F6021
  7. Department of the Navy· Shelby County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Feb 24, 2021 – Mar 13, 2026· N6945021F0094
  8. Department of the Navy· York County, ME· Facilities & utilities· Jan 14, 2026 – Jan 14, 2026· N4008526F0149

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NASHVILLE, TN · 2 entities · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Facilities support services
  2. IMAQ EML JV, LLC$14.5M+128% in FY2026
    ANCHORAGE, AK · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Facilities support services
  3. NV ENTERPRISES, INC.$12.6M+15% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both servePublic Buildings Service · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.