Federal contractor · LOS ANGELES, CA

FOUR TRIBES ENTERPRISES, LLC

No contract obligations recorded for FOUR TRIBES ENTERPRISES, LLC in FY2026. Since FY2021: $2M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
K3BPCFNHA9D4
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the FOUR TRIBES ENTERPRISES, LLC company family: 4 registered entities, $13.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. FOUR TRIBES ENTERPRISES, LLCRENO, NV · Family page
    $13.4M
  2. $151.3K
  3. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.7MFY2021
  2. 71.2KFY2022
  3. 178.4KFY2023

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for FOUR TRIBES ENTERPRISES, LLC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

5 companies · $9.9M reported

  1. ROSEVILLE, CA · 1 subaward · Utility system construction
  2. LOMPOC, CA · 3 subawards · Utility system construction
  3. MNS ENGINEERS, INC.$460.7K
    SANTA BARBARA, CA · 2 subawards · Utility system construction

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 12 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ELITE PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION INC.$23.4M−59% in FY2026
    KANEOHE, HI · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionPublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building construction
  2. NICHOLS CONTRACTING, INC.$49M−62% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionPublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building construction
  3. GLOBAL GO, LLC$25.6M+636% in FY2026
    FORT LAUDERDALE, FL · 48% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionPublic Buildings Service · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.