Federal contractor · SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA

GENENTECH INC

No contract obligations recorded for GENENTECH INC in FY2026. Since FY2025: $1.1M. Its largest customer was Food and Drug Administration ($0).

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
F7F8GZXL7Q93
Parent company
ROCHE HOLDING AG
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION company family: 6 registered entities, $109.2M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATIONINDIANAPOLIS, IN · Family page
    $89.1M
  2. $19.2M
  3. GENENTECH USA, INCSOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA
    $939.6K
  4. $0
  5. -$13.1K

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1MFY2025
  2. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Food and Drug Administration· Montgomery County, MD· Research & development· Sep 11, 2025 – Jun 11, 2026· 75F40125C00069

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

GENENTECH INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0
Since FY2021
$299.7K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 256.3KFY2021
  2. 260.8KFY2022
  3. 0FY2023
  4. -217.4KFY2025

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2021–FY2025.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $547K reported

  1. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. LAUREL, MD · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 45 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC$163.2M−82% in FY2026
    RAHWAY, NJ · 2 entities · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response · Pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturingVeterans Affairs · Pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing
  2. ELUSYS THERAPEUTICS INC$123.9M−100% in FY2026
    PARSIPPANY, NJ · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response · Pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing
  3. PHLOW CORP.$204.8M+1,158% in FY2026
    RICHMOND, VA · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response · Pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION (6 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Foundation Medicine, Inc.AI match · 100%
  • GENENTECH INC.AI match · 100%
  • Genentech USA, Inc.AI match · 100%
  • ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATIONAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$10.7M
102 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$35.9M
$35.9M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$404.5K
2 PACs

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$9.9M
    103 reports
  2. 2024$9.5M
    96 reports
  3. 2025$10.7M
    102 reports
  4. 2026$5.8M
    51 reports

Top issues

  1. Health issues255 reports
  2. Medicare and Medicaid181 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations59 reports
  4. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code55 reports
  5. Copyright, patent and trademark51 reports
  6. Pharmacy46 reports
  7. Trade (domestic and foreign)46 reports
  8. Manufacturing28 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES293 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE282 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Tarplin, Downs & Young, LLC$2M
    28 reports
  2. The McManus Group$990K
    22 reports
  3. OGR$960K
    14 reports
  4. Tiber Creek Group$840K
    14 reports
  5. Tiber Creek Health Strategies, Inc.$840K
    14 reports
  6. Todd Strategy Group$840K
    14 reports
  7. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC$840K
    14 reports
  8. Capitol Counsel LLC$720K
    14 reports

28 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Democratic$221.5K55%
  2. Republican$182K45%
  3. Other or none$1,0000.2%

PACs sponsored

  • GENENTECH INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (GENENPAC)$757.9K raised this cycle
  • ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION PAC (ROCHE DXPAC)$150.7K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.