Federal contractor · LAUREL, MD

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC received $1.8B in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 801 awards (−22% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $16.3B. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($548.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8B
New awards
801
Sole-source
98%
Single offer
0.4%
UEI
C1HBCJ9RMBV3
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

13 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $2.4B in FY2026 together.

  1. THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLCLAUREL, MD · Family page
    $1.8B
  2. $495.1M
  3. $30.2M
  4. $886.5K
  5. $69.1K
  6. $0
  7. $0
  8. $0
  9. $0
  10. $0
  11. $0
  12. $0
  13. -$115.8K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-06

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.1BFY2017
  2. 1.2BFY2018
  3. 1.3BFY2019
  4. 1.5BFY2020
  5. 1.5BFY2021
  6. 1.6BFY2022
  7. 2BFY2023
  8. 2BFY2024
  9. 2.4BFY2025
  10. 1.8BFY2026
  11. 0FY2027

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 352 awards
  2. 85 awards
  3. 77 awards
  4. 54 awards
  5. 67 awards
  6. 17 awards
  7. 17 awards
  8. 14 awards
  9. 3 awards
  10. 19 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$1.6B85%
  2. Professional services$238.1M13%
  3. IT & telecom$11.3M0.6%
  4. Equipment maintenance$11.2M0.6%
  5. Health & medical$8M0.4%
  6. Transportation & logistics$7.8M0.4%
  7. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$7.6M0.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition99%
    US 39% · $1.8B
  • Sole-source awards98%
    US 30% · $1.8B
  • Single-offer competitions0.4%
    US 8.7% · $6.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 93 awards
  2. National Aeronautics and Space Administration · 19 awards
  3. Department of Defense · 15 awards
  4. Department of Defense · 14 awards
  5. Department of Defense · 15 awards

Largest awards

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Howard County, MD· Research & development· Mar 2, 2022 – Sep 22, 2026· 80MSFC22F0048
  2. SOLAR PROBE PLUS (SPP) PHASE A ACTIVITIES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE WORK THAT IS DESIGNATED IN TASK ORDERS ISSUED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER. THE OVERALL SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED WILL SUPPORT ALL OF NASA'S MISSION DIRECTORATES. THESE EFFORTS CAN BE CHARACTERIZED AS AEROSPACE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT (ARDES). THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE TASKS TO BE DEVELOPED WILL BE TO CONDUCT SUPPORTING RESEARCH AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT DESIGNED TO MAKE CONTRIBUTIONS TO SPACE SCIENCE AND SPACE EXPLORATION AND ASSIST NASA IN THE FORMULATION AND EXECUTION OF ITS PROGRAMS BY PROVIDING NASA WITH TECHNICAL ADVICE, STUDIES, AND REPORTS OF INVESTIGATIONS. EFFORTS UNDERTAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR, IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ASSIGNED TASKS, WHICH INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, PARTNERING AND COMMERCIALIZATION ACTIVITIES, SHALL SEEK TO ENHANCE THE VALUE AND CONTRIBUTION OF TECHNOLOGY TO THE NATION S TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETITIVENESS, PROSPERITY, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND OTHER NATIONAL PRIORITIES. INDIVIDUAL TASK ORDERS WILL FALL WITHIN ONE OF TWO BROAD CATEGORIES: 1) ESSENTIAL RESEARCH CAPABILITY OF SPACE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, AND RELATED WORK IN THE SUPPORTING ESSENTIAL RESEARCH CAPABILITIES OF SYSTEMS TEST AND EVALUATION, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, AND SIMULATION, MODELING AND OPERATIONS ANALYSIS. TASK ORDERS WITHIN THE CATEGORY OF ESSENTIAL RESEARCH CAPABILITIES ARE INTENDED TO PRESERVE THE NATION S CAPABILITIES TO PERFORM ROBOTIC SPACE MISSIONS OVER THE FULL MISSION LIFE CYCLE FROM CONCEPT FORMULATION THROUGH MISSION OPERATIONS AND DATA ANALYSIS. NASA IS CONTRACTING FOR SUPPORT IN SEVERAL KEY RESEARCH, ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPETENCIES THAT ARE FUNDAMENTAL TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THESE MISSIONS. 2) OTHER AEROSPACE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT. TASK ORDERS WITHIN THE CATEGORY OF OTHER AEROSPACE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT ARE INTENDED TO INCLUDE A BROAD BASE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES RELEVANT TO NASA PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS. REGARDLESS OF CATEGORY, TASK ORDERS MAY BE ISSUED RELATED TO AUTONOMOUS DEEP-SPACE AND EARTH-ORBITING SPACECRAFT OR MAJOR SUBSYSTEMS, EXPERIMENTS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DEVICES THAT MAY BE CARRIED AS PAYLOADS ON THE SPACE SHUTTLE OR ON OTHER SPACECRAFT. TASK ASSIGNMENTS WILL EXPLICITLY DESCRIBE A BROAD RANGE OF HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS, AND MANAGEMENT EFFORTS INCLUDING PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION.$894.5M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Howard County, MD· Research & development· Oct 25, 2016 – Jan 21, 2026· NNN10AA08T
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Howard County, MD· Research & development· Jul 21, 2021 – Mar 19, 2026· 80MSFC21F0224
  4. Washington Headquarters Services· Howard County, MD· Professional services· Jun 3, 2019 – Jun 11, 2026· HQ003419F0278
  5. Washington Headquarters Services· Howard County, MD· Professional services· Jun 30, 2022 – May 20, 2026· HQ003422F0001
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Howard County, MD· Research & development· Aug 23, 2019 – Apr 28, 2026· GSFC0199706DNAS597179
  7. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency· Howard County, MD· Research & development· Jan 14, 2025 – Mar 24, 2026· HR001125F0008
  8. ASTERIOD IMPACT AND DEFLECTION ASSESSMENT (AIDA) - DOUBLE ASTERIOD REDIRECTION TEST (DART) PHASE A STUDY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM THE WORK THAT IS DESIGNATED IN TASK ORDERS ISSUED BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER. THE OVERALL SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED WILL SUPPORT ALL OF NASA'S MISSION DIRECTORATES. THESE EFFORTS CAN BE CHARACTERIZED AS AEROSPACE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT (ARDES). THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE TASKS TO BE DEVELOPED WILL BE TO CONDUCT SUPPORTING RESEARCH AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT DESIGNED TO MAKE CONTRIBUTIONS TO SPACE SCIENCE AND SPACE EXPLORATION AND ASSIST NASA IN THE FORMULATION AND EXECUTION OF ITS PROGRAMS BY PROVIDING NASA WITH TECHNICAL ADVICE, STUDIES, AND REPORTS OF INVESTIGATIONS. EFFORTS UNDERTAKEN BY THE CONTRACTOR, IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THE ASSIGNED TASKS, WHICH INCLUDE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, PARTNERING AND COMMERCIALIZATION ACTIVITIES, SHALL SEEK TO ENHANCE THE VALUE AND CONTRIBUTION OF TECHNOLOGY TO THE NATION IS TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETITIVENESS, PROSPERITY, QUALITY OF LIFE, AND OTHER NATIONAL PRIORITIES. INDIVIDUAL TASK ORDERS WILL FALL WITHIN ONE OF TWO BROAD CATEGORIES: 1) ESSENTIAL RESEARCH CAPABILITY OF SPACE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, AND RELATED WORK IN THE SUPPORTING ESSENTIAL RESEARCH CAPABILITIES OF SYSTEMS TEST AND EVALUATION, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, AND SIMULATION, MODELING AND OPERATIONS ANALYSIS. TASK ORDERS WITHIN THE CATEGORY OF ESSENTIAL RESEARCH CAPABILITIES ARE INTENDED TO PRESERVE THE NATION IS CAPABILITIES TO PERFORM ROBOTIC SPACE MISSIONS OVER THE FULL MISSION LIFE CYCLE FROM CONCEPT FORMULATION THROUGH MISSION OPERATIONS AND DATA ANALYSIS. NASA IS CONTRACTING FOR SUPPORT IN SEVERAL KEY RESEARCH, ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT COMPETENCIES THAT ARE FUNDAMENTAL TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THESE MISSIONS. 2) OTHER AEROSPACE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT. TASK ORDERS WITHIN THE CATEGORY OF OTHER AEROSPACE RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT ARE INTENDED TO INCLUDE A BROAD BASE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES RELEVANT TO NASA PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES AND ASSIGNMENTS. REGARDLESS OF CATEGORY, TASK ORDERS MAY BE ISSUED RELATED TO AUTONOMOUS DEEP-SPACE AND EARTH-ORBITING SPACECRAFT OR MAJOR SUBSYSTEMS, EXPERIMENTS, INSTRUMENTS OR OTHER DEVICES THAT MAY BE CARRIED AS PAYLOADS ON THE SPACE SHUTTLE OR ON OTHER SPACECRAFT. TASK ASSIGNMENTS WILL EXPLICITLY DESCRIBE A BROAD RANGE OF HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS, AND MANAGEMENT EFFORTS INCLUDING PROGRAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION.$222M
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration· Howard County, MD· Research & development· Dec 6, 2016 – Jan 8, 2026· NNN15AA05T

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
1
Since FY2022
$321K

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 100KFY2022
  2. 221KFY2023
  3. 0FY2024
  4. 0FY2025
  5. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. 81.049 · Office of Science Financial Assistance Program· Department of Energy· Project grant· Sep 25, 2023 – Jul 13, 2026· DESC0024561

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2022–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $68.3M (244 subawards)

152 sub-recipients

  1. LITTLETON, CO · 1 subaward
  2. SAN JOSE, CA · 1 subaward
  3. WASHINGTON, DC · 3 subawards
  4. ARLINGTON, VA · 1 subaward
  5. BERKELEY, CA · 4 subawards
  6. LOGAN, UT · 1 subaward
  7. COLUMBIA, MD · 1 subaward
  8. MAHONEY MANAGEMENT INC$2.2M3.2%
    MIDDLETOWN, VA · 6 subawards
  9. PENSACOLA, FL · 11 subawards
  10. WASHINGTON, DC · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $4.1M (2 subawards)
  • Sub-grants: $3.9M (24 subawards)

20 primes

  1. DURHAM, NH · 1 subaward
  2. BALTIMORE, MD · 3 subawards
  3. BETHESDA, MD · 1 subaward
  4. HANOVER, NH · 1 subaward
  5. BALTIMORE, MD · 1 subaward
  6. HOUSTON, TX · 2 subawards
  7. BETHESDA, MD · 1 subaward
  8. BOULDER, CO · 3 subawards
  9. BALTIMORE, MD · 2 subawards
  10. CHAPEL HILL, NC · 1 subaward

Its reported sub-contracts equal 3.7% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $1.4M paid out · $4.2M received
  • FY2022: $123.5M paid out · $4.7M received
  • FY2023: $230.9M paid out · $5.4M received
  • FY2024: $259.5M paid out · $10.5M received
  • FY2025: $212.5M paid out · $11.3M received
  • FY2026: $68.3M paid out · $8M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1,737 companies · $5.8B reported

  1. PHILADELPHIA, PA · 47 subawards
  2. MACHA RESEARCH TRUST LIMITED$1.3B
    CHOMA, ZMB · 13 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. TUCSON, AZ · 28 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Primes that pay it

328 companies · $757M reported

  1. BALTIMORE, MD · 49 subawards
  2. NEW YORK, NY · 54 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. SEATTLE, WA · 29 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 79 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. EVERNORTH FEDERAL SERVICES INC$1.9B+7.9% in FY2026
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 19% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Insurance carriers
  2. MARTINS POINT HEALTH CARE INC$1.3B+1.6% in FY2026
    PORTLAND, ME · 16% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Health Agency · Insurance carriers
  3. BLUE ORIGIN MANUFACTURING, LLC$1.7B−38% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 17% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY APPLIED PHYSICS LABORATORY LLC (13 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYAI match · 100%
  • The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics LaboratoryAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.3M
25 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.2M
$3.2M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$640K
    12 reports
  2. 2024$670K
    14 reports
  3. 2025$1.3M
    25 reports
  4. 2026$630K
    14 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations57 reports
  2. Education39 reports
  3. Science and technology35 reports
  4. Health issues31 reports
  5. Defense20 reports
  6. Medicare and Medicaid19 reports
  7. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code17 reports
  8. Firearms, guns and ammunition9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES59 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE59 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. ACTUM I, LLC$1.2M
    14 reports
  2. Cornerstone Government Affairs, Inc.$780K
    13 reports
  3. Miller Strategies, LLC$320K
    6 reports
  4. FGS Global (US) LLC (FKA FGH Holdings LLC)$250K
    5 reports
  5. Icebreaker Strategies, LLC$240K
    5 reports
  6. HB STRATEGIES$215K
    5 reports
  7. Clark Hill, PLC$30K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 6, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.