Federal contractor · CHAMBLEE, GA

GENERATION ORBIT LAUNCH SERVICES, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for GENERATION ORBIT LAUNCH SERVICES, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $32M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
JJGCWZSVYTL5
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the SPACEWORKS ENTERPRISES INC company family: 2 registered entities, $3.4M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. SPACEWORKS ENTERPRISES INCATLANTA, GA · Family page
    $3.4M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 4.8MFY2017
  2. 5.8MFY2018
  3. 11.5MFY2019
  4. 6.2MFY2020
  5. 2.7MFY2021
  6. 1MFY2022
  7. -155.9KFY2023

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for GENERATION ORBIT LAUNCH SERVICES, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $239.4K reported

  1. GREENVILLE, TX · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  2. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services
  3. CENTREVILLE, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 67% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services
  2. SPORIAN MICROSYSTEMS, INC$7.5M−59% in FY2026
    LAFAYETTE, CO · 56% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesMissile Defense Agency · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services+1 more
  3. FLIGHT WORKS, INC$10.6M−99% in FY2026
    IRVINE, CA · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development servicesNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development servicesNavy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.