Federal contractor · BENNEKOM

GEOCAT B.V.

GEOCAT B.V. received $63K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+5% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $186K. Its largest customer was Agricultural Research Service ($63K).

Obligations · FY2026
$63K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
TYZ6GFW8UTG6
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 63KFY2024
  2. 60KFY2025
  3. 63KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$63K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $63K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $63K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Agricultural Research Service· Prince George's County, MD· Professional services· Sep 26, 2024 – Jun 11, 2026· 1232SA24P0057

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

GEOCAT B.V. received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 55KFY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2024.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KEYHOLE SOFTWARE LLC$194.8K−100% in FY2026
    OVERLAND PARK, KS · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Computer systems design and related services
  2. THOMAS BAKER$128.5K−100% in FY2026
    BONN, DEU · 69% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Computer systems design and related services
  3. GORDON FLESCH COMPANY, INC.$103.1K−100% in FY2026
    MADISON, WI · 3 entities · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAgricultural Research Service · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.