Federal contractor · MECHANICSBURG, PA

GFT INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.

GFT INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. received $12.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 19 awards (+303% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $53.6M. Its largest customer was U.S. Coast Guard ($8M).

Obligations · FY2026
$12.7M
New awards
19
Sole-source
0.4%
Single offer
58%
UEI
HLNDLH9XRTU9
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

6 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $14.7M in FY2026 together.

  1. GFT INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.MECHANICSBURG, PA · Family page
    $12.7M
  2. $1.9M
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. GANNETT FLEMING, INC.NEWPORT NEWS, VA
    $0
  6. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 6.5MFY2017
  2. 5.3MFY2018
  3. 5.5MFY2019
  4. 1.8MFY2020
  5. 2.7MFY2021
  6. 5MFY2022
  7. 2.8MFY2023
  8. 8.1MFY2024
  9. 3.2MFY2025
  10. 12.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 5 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. USTRANSCOM$901.4K7.1%
    2 awards
  4. 2 awards
  5. 2 awards
  6. 1 awards
  7. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$13.3M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition58%
    US 39% · $7.4M
  • Sole-source awards0.4%
    US 30% · $45.1K
  • Single-offer competitions58%
    US 8.8% · $7.3M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Interior · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. U.S. Coast Guard· Kanawha County, WV· Construction & real property· Dec 15, 2025 – Sep 24, 2026· 70Z05026F43000003
  2. U.S. Coast Guard· Kodiak Island Borough, AK· Construction & real property· Sep 18, 2024 – Aug 18, 2026· 70Z05024FESDV0001
  3. Federal Law Enforcement Training Center· Glynn County, GA· Construction & real property· Aug 27, 2026 – Aug 27, 2026· 70LGLY26FSSB00059
  4. U.S. Coast Guard· Construction & real property· Dec 2, 2020 – Aug 5, 2026· 70Z04721FASBRFP00
  5. U.S. Coast Guard· Lane County, OR· Professional services· Sep 16, 2022 – Sep 28, 2026· 70Z05022F43000013
  6. Federal Transit Administration· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 18, 2024 – Aug 27, 2026· 69319524F30123N
  7. USTRANSCOM· St. Clair County, IL· Construction & real property· Mar 23, 2023 – Mar 2, 2026· HTC71123FD055
  8. USTRANSCOM· St. Clair County, IL· Construction & real property· Mar 24, 2023 – Mar 2, 2026· HTC71123FD056

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $125K (4 subawards)

1 prime

  1. CARLSBAD, CA · 4 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $36.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $317.8K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $125K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

12 companies · $3.7M reported

  1. VIENNA, VA · 23 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 3 subawards
  3. ENGLEWOOD, CO · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. PORTSMOUTH, NH · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. WSP E&IS - HDR JOINT VENTURE$14.8M−39% in FY2026
    RALEIGH, NC · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesFederal Law Enforcement Training Center · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. LLOYD COLLINS JV$17M+18% in FY2026
    BELLAIRE, TX · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Coast Guard · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of GFT INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. (6 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • GANNETT FLEMING, INC.AI match · 100%
  • GFT Infrastructure, Inc.AI match · 94%
Lobbying · 2026
$30K
1 reports
PAC giving · 2026
$13K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2026$30K
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Aviation, aircraft and airlines1 reports
  2. Roads and highways1 reports
  3. Railroads1 reports
  4. Transportation1 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES1 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE1 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. FEDERAL HILL GROUP, LLC$30K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$10.5K81%
  2. Democratic$2,50019%

PACs sponsored

  • GANNETT FLEMING, INC PAC$59.3K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.