Federal contractor · CHUO-KU

GILBANE JAPAN GK

GILBANE JAPAN GK received $98.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+101% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $500.5M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($53.1M).

Obligations · FY2026
$98.5M
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
58%
UEI
CDTKNLJZBU43
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 54.3MFY2017
  2. 203.7KFY2018
  3. -3.4MFY2019
  4. 5.6MFY2020
  5. 141.3KFY2021
  6. 75.7MFY2022
  7. 152.2MFY2023
  8. 68.1MFY2024
  9. 49.1MFY2025
  10. 98.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$98.5M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$98.5M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition58%
    US 39% · $57.6M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions58%
    US 8.7% · $57.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Jul 14, 2022 – Jun 9, 2026· W912HV22C0006
  2. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2023 – Apr 24, 2026· W912HV23C0014
  3. Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Dec 18, 2025 – Dec 18, 2025· FA527026CC001
  4. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Apr 29, 2022 – Mar 31, 2026· W912HV22C0002
  5. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Feb 3, 2023 – Mar 19, 2026· W912HV23C0005
  6. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· May 15, 2026 – May 15, 2026· W912HV26CA001
  7. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Aug 11, 2025 – May 6, 2026· W912HV25C0004

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $5.8M (2 subawards)

2 sub-recipients

  1. MOON TOWNSHIP, PA · 1 subaward
  2. YOKOHAMA, JPN · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 5.9% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $5.8M reported

  1. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. YOKOHAMA, JPN · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WAYSS & FREYTAG INGENIEURBAU AG$147.2M+92% in FY2026
    FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DEU · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  2. GUYCO INC$116M−95% in FY2026
    LAMPASAS, TX · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. PONO AINA MANAGEMENT LLC$166.4M−60% in FY2026
    MIDWEST CITY, OK · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.