Federal contractor · MIDWEST CITY, OK
PONO AINA MANAGEMENT LLC
PONO AINA MANAGEMENT LLC received $10.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 16 awards (−60% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $283.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($5.5M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $10.9M
- New awards
- 16
- Sole-source
- 28%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- GRG1UC56UWN7
- Parent company
- PONO AINA MANAGEMENT LLC
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 5.7MFY2019
- 8.1MFY2020
- 14.4MFY2021
- 59.9MFY2022
- 29.5MFY2023
- 128.2MFY2024
- 27.2MFY2025
- 10.9MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$5.5M50%3 awards
- Department of the Army$4.8M44%5 awards
- U.S. Special Operations Command$709.3K6.5%1 awards
- Department of the Navy$00.0%1 awards
- 1 awards
- 1 awards
- Department of State-$94.5K0.0%4 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$10.2M93%
- IT & telecom$709.3K6.5%
Where the work was performed
- Jackson County, OK$4.1M38%
- Maui County, HI$3.7M34%
- Ward County, ND$2.2M20%
- Bernalillo County, NM$1.3M12%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition28%US 39% · $3.1M
- Sole-source awards28%US 30% · $3.1M
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Army· Maui County, HI· Construction & real property· Nov 4, 2023 – Feb 23, 2026· W9128A24C0003
- LABOR$15.3MU.S. Special Operations Command· Oklahoma County, OK· IT & telecom· Mar 31, 2022 – Mar 30, 2026· H9240422C0008
- Department of the Air Force· Bernalillo County, NM· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2024 – May 4, 2026· FA940124C0023
- Department of the Air Force· Jackson County, OK· Construction & real property· Dec 27, 2023 – Dec 16, 2025· FA441924F0035
- Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Professional services· Jul 14, 2025 – Apr 1, 2026· W912DY25CA005
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Carteret County, NC· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2025 – Jul 20, 2026· 1305M425C0032
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- NATIVE AMERICAN SERVICES CORP.$147.6M−49% in FY2026KELLOGG, ID · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
- GIDEON CONTRACTING, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY$130M−34% in FY2026SAN ANTONIO, TX · 5 entities · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
- GILBANE JAPAN GK$215.7M+101% in FY2026CHUO-KU, JPN · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.