Federal contractor · SAN FRANCISCO, CA

GITHUB INC

GITHUB INC received $50.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−6.3% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $305.7K. Its largest customer was Executive Office of the President ($48.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$50.5K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WR2ZN519GFX4
Parent company
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the MICROSOFT CORPORATION company family: 11 registered entities, $443.6M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. MICROSOFT CORPORATIONREDMOND, WA · Family page
    $443M
  2. MICROSOFT CORPORATIONRESTON, VA
    $582.3K
  3. DICTAPHONE CORPORATIONSTRATFORD, CT
    $0
  4. FAST SEARCH & TRANSFER, INC.NEEDHAM, MA
    $0
  5. MICROSOFT CORPORATIONWASHINGTON, DC
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 26.1KFY2017
  2. 37KFY2018
  3. 7.9KFY2019
  4. 12.7KFY2020
  5. 1.2KFY2021
  6. 52.4KFY2022
  7. 26.1KFY2023
  8. 37.9KFY2024
  9. 53.9KFY2025
  10. 50.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Executive Office of the President$48.1K95%
    1 awards
  2. Federal Communications Commission$2,4004.8%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$50.5K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. District of Columbia, DC$48.1K95%
  2. San Francisco County, CA$2,4004.8%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $50.5K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $50.5K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Federal Communications Commission$2,400
    Federal Communications Commission · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. GITHUB CODESPACES$158.7K
    Executive Office of the President· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Apr 13, 2023 – Jan 7, 2026· 11316023P0005OAS
  2. GITHUB'S TEAM PLAN SOFTWARE$2,400
    Federal Communications Commission· San Francisco County, CA· IT & telecom· Apr 28, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· 273FCC26P0034

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $80.6K (2 subawards)

1 prime

  1. LINQUEST CORPORATION$80.6K100%
    HERNDON, VA · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $85.7K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $80.6K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

33 companies · $222.6M reported

  1. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION$76.7M
    GROTON, CT · 59 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  2. CACI, INC. - FEDERAL$35.8M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 19 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
  3. ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC$31.3M
    ARLINGTON, VA · 40 subawards · Software publishers

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 40 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. WORLD WIDE TECHNOLOGY LLC$1.4B−26% in FY2026
    MARYLAND HEIGHTS, MO · 2 entities · 43% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related servicesOffices, Boards and Divisions · Computer systems design and related servicesDefense Health Agency · Computer systems design and related services+1 more
  2. IRON BOW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$1.3B−27% in FY2026
    HERNDON, VA · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Computer systems design and related services
  3. AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.$1.2B+84% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 7 entities · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Information Systems Agency · Data processing, hosting, and related servicesArmy · Data processing, hosting, and related servicesOffice of the Chief Financial Officer · Data processing, hosting, and related services+2 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of MICROSOFT CORPORATION (11 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • MICROSOFT CORPORATIONAI match · 99%
Lobbying · 2025
$9.4M
83 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$32.8M
$32.8M in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$520.5K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$9M
    85 reports
  2. 2024$9.4M
    87 reports
  3. 2025$9.4M
    83 reports
  4. 2026$5.1M
    38 reports

Top issues

  1. Computer industry121 reports
  2. Telecommunications91 reports
  3. Labor issues, antitrust and workplace69 reports
  4. Science and technology67 reports
  5. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code66 reports
  6. Immigration60 reports
  7. Copyright, patent and trademark53 reports
  8. Homeland security50 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES239 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE228 reports
  3. Transportation - Dept of (DOT)31 reports
  4. Defense - Dept of (DOD)24 reports
  5. Treasury - Dept of24 reports
  6. Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)23 reports
  7. Labor - Dept of (DOL)22 reports
  8. White House Office22 reports
  9. Education - Dept of21 reports
  10. Executive Office of the President (EOP)21 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Tiber Creek Group$1.3M
    14 reports
  2. Penn Hill Group$1.1M
    14 reports
  3. Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$830K
    14 reports
  4. Stewart Strategies and Solutions, LLC$770K
    14 reports
  5. ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC$740K
    14 reports
  6. CGCN GROUP, LLC$740K
    9 reports
  7. D&P Creative Strategies, LLC$700K
    14 reports
  8. LOT SIXTEEN LLC$700K
    14 reports

27 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$290.5K56%
  2. Democratic$230K44%

PACs sponsored

  • MICROSOFT CORPORATION STAKEHOLDERS VOLUNTARY PAC - MSVPAC$1.4M raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.